Short‐ and long‐term wildfire threat when adapting infrastructure for wildlife conservation in the boreal forest

Abstract Managers designing infrastructure in fire‐prone wildland areas require assessments of wildfire threat to quantify uncertainty due to future vegetation and climatic conditions. In this study, we combine wildfire simulation and forest landscape composition modeling to identify areas that woul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Applications
Main Authors: Dawe, Denyse A., Parisien, Marc‐André, Boulanger, Yan, Boucher, Jonathan, Beauchemin, Alexandre, Arseneault, Dominique
Other Authors: Hydro-Québec, Natural Resources Canada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2606
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2606
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eap.2606
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2606
Description
Summary:Abstract Managers designing infrastructure in fire‐prone wildland areas require assessments of wildfire threat to quantify uncertainty due to future vegetation and climatic conditions. In this study, we combine wildfire simulation and forest landscape composition modeling to identify areas that would be highly susceptible to wildfire around a proposed conservation corridor in Québec, Canada. In this measure, managers have proposed raising the conductors of a new 735‐kV hydroelectric powerline above the forest canopy within a wildlife connectivity corridor to mitigate the impacts to threatened boreal woodland caribou ( Rangifer tarandus ). Retention of coniferous vegetation, however, can increase the likelihood of an intense wildfire damaging powerline infrastructure. To assess the likelihood of high‐intensity wildfires for the next 100 years, we evaluated three time periods (2020, 2070, 2120), three climate scenarios (observed, RCP 4.5, RCP 8.5), and four vegetation projections (static, no harvest, extensive harvesting, harvesting excluded in protected areas). Under present‐day conditions, we found a lower probability of high‐intensity wildfire within the corridor than in other parts of the study area, due to the protective influence of a nearby, poorly regenerated burned area. Wildfire probability will increase into the future, with strong, weather‐induced inflation in the number of annual ignitions and wildfire spread potential. However, a conversion to less‐flammable vegetation triggered by interactions between climate change and disturbance may attenuate this trend. By addressing the range of uncertainty of future conditions, we present a robust strategy to assist in decision‐making about long‐term risk management for both the proposed conservation measure and the powerline.