Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis
Abstract Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi‐analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Ga...
Published in: | Astronomische Nachrichten |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710820 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fasna.200710820 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asna.200710820 |
id |
crwiley:10.1002/asna.200710820 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1002/asna.200710820 2024-06-02T07:58:16+00:00 Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis Crouzet, N. Guillot, T. Fressin, F. Blazit, A. the A STEP team 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710820 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fasna.200710820 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asna.200710820 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Astronomische Nachrichten volume 328, issue 8, page 805-808 ISSN 0004-6337 1521-3994 journal-article 2007 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710820 2024-05-03T11:59:11Z Abstract Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi‐analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front‐ with a back‐illuminated CCD through a Monte‐Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front‐illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Wiley Online Library Astronomische Nachrichten 328 8 805 808 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi‐analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front‐ with a back‐illuminated CCD through a Monte‐Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front‐illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Crouzet, N. Guillot, T. Fressin, F. Blazit, A. the A STEP team |
spellingShingle |
Crouzet, N. Guillot, T. Fressin, F. Blazit, A. the A STEP team Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
author_facet |
Crouzet, N. Guillot, T. Fressin, F. Blazit, A. the A STEP team |
author_sort |
Crouzet, N. |
title |
Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
title_short |
Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
title_full |
Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
title_fullStr |
Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Front‐ vs. back‐illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
title_sort |
front‐ vs. back‐illuminated ccd cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710820 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fasna.200710820 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asna.200710820 |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctica |
op_source |
Astronomische Nachrichten volume 328, issue 8, page 805-808 ISSN 0004-6337 1521-3994 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710820 |
container_title |
Astronomische Nachrichten |
container_volume |
328 |
container_issue |
8 |
container_start_page |
805 |
op_container_end_page |
808 |
_version_ |
1800741563732590592 |