Expansion of Alternative Autoantibodies Does Not Follow the Evolution of Anti–Citrullinated Protein Antibodies in Preclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Analysis in At‐Risk First Degree Relatives

Objective Co‐occurrence of autoantibodies specific for ≥1 autoimmune disease is widely prevalent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. To understand the prevalence of polyautoimmunity in preclinical RA, we performed a comprehensive autoantibody assessment in a First Nations cohort of at‐risk first‐...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis & Rheumatology
Main Authors: Anaparti, Vidyanand, Smolik, Irene, Meng, Xiaobo, O’Neil, Liam, Jantz, Mackenzie A., Fritzler, Marvin J., El‐Gabalawy, Hani
Other Authors: Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis, Arthritis Society
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41675
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/art.41675
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/art.41675
Description
Summary:Objective Co‐occurrence of autoantibodies specific for ≥1 autoimmune disease is widely prevalent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. To understand the prevalence of polyautoimmunity in preclinical RA, we performed a comprehensive autoantibody assessment in a First Nations cohort of at‐risk first‐degree relatives (FDR) of RA patients, a subset of whom subsequently developed RA (progressors). Methods Venous blood was collected from all study participants (n = 50 RA patients and 64 FDR) at scheduled visits, and serum was stored at −20°C. High‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein level, anti–citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status, and autoantibody status were determined using commercially available enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits. Rheumatoid factor (RF) was detected by nephelometry. Antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) were identified using Hep‐2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and classified according to international consensus nomenclature as various anti‐cell (AC) patterns. Results Of our study cohort, 78.9% had positive ANA reactivity (≥1:80), which was either a homogenous, fine‐speckled (AC‐1 and AC‐4) or mixed IFA pattern. Importantly, the AC‐4 and mixed ANA patterns were also observed in progressors at the time of disease onset. While all of the RA patients showed a high prevalence of arthritis‐associated autoantibodies, they also had a high prevalence of extractable nuclear antigen–positive autoantibodies to other autoantigens. In FDR, we did not observe any increase in serum autoreactivity to nonarthritis autoantigens, either cross‐sectionally or in samples collected longitudinally from progressors prior to RA onset. Conclusion While alternative autoimmunity and ANA positivity are widely prevalent in First Nations populations, including asymptomatic, seronegative FDR, expansion of alternative autoimmunity does not occur in parallel with ACPA expansion in FDR and is restricted to patients with established RA.