On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland

Abstract Structures in Iceland were traditionally built of turf, earth and, to a lesser extent, stone. As turf was the primary construction material, the contrast in geophysical parameters between building ruins and surrounding soil is expected to be low. To investigate the extent to which the remai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archaeological Prospection
Main Authors: Wunderlich, Tina, Wilken, Dennis, Andersen, Jasmin, Rabbel, Wolfgang, Zori, Davide, Kalmring, Sven, Byock, Jesse
Other Authors: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.1506
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Farp.1506
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/arp.1506
id crwiley:10.1002/arp.1506
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/arp.1506 2024-06-23T07:53:57+00:00 On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland Wunderlich, Tina Wilken, Dennis Andersen, Jasmin Rabbel, Wolfgang Zori, Davide Kalmring, Sven Byock, Jesse Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.1506 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Farp.1506 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/arp.1506 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Archaeological Prospection volume 22, issue 3, page 171-186 ISSN 1075-2196 1099-0763 journal-article 2015 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1506 2024-06-11T04:49:58Z Abstract Structures in Iceland were traditionally built of turf, earth and, to a lesser extent, stone. As turf was the primary construction material, the contrast in geophysical parameters between building ruins and surrounding soil is expected to be low. To investigate the extent to which the remains of turf buildings can be detected by geophysical measurements, we applied several geophysical techniques to a known turf ruin in southwestern Iceland. The methods used were magnetics, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR), electromagnetic induction (EMI), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic Rayleigh‐wave resonance mapping (RRM). Magnetics identified an accumulation of stones inside and beside the ruin. The in‐phase component of the EMI measurements, which can be related to magnetic susceptibility, showed the same pattern. A very precise image of the stones lining the inside of the former turf walls was generated by GPR. In contrast, EMI conductivity and ERT imaged the actual turf in the walls. Turf walls have lower electrical conductivity compared with the surrounding soil, probably as a result of different porosities. The mapping of Rayleigh wave resonance clearly revealed the outline of the ruin, as indicated by weaker amplitudes compared with the surrounding soil. Overall the results indicate that geophysical methods can be used for subsurface mapping of Icelandic turf structures and that the combined application of the methods maximizes this potential. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Wiley Online Library Archaeological Prospection 22 3 171 186
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Structures in Iceland were traditionally built of turf, earth and, to a lesser extent, stone. As turf was the primary construction material, the contrast in geophysical parameters between building ruins and surrounding soil is expected to be low. To investigate the extent to which the remains of turf buildings can be detected by geophysical measurements, we applied several geophysical techniques to a known turf ruin in southwestern Iceland. The methods used were magnetics, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR), electromagnetic induction (EMI), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic Rayleigh‐wave resonance mapping (RRM). Magnetics identified an accumulation of stones inside and beside the ruin. The in‐phase component of the EMI measurements, which can be related to magnetic susceptibility, showed the same pattern. A very precise image of the stones lining the inside of the former turf walls was generated by GPR. In contrast, EMI conductivity and ERT imaged the actual turf in the walls. Turf walls have lower electrical conductivity compared with the surrounding soil, probably as a result of different porosities. The mapping of Rayleigh wave resonance clearly revealed the outline of the ruin, as indicated by weaker amplitudes compared with the surrounding soil. Overall the results indicate that geophysical methods can be used for subsurface mapping of Icelandic turf structures and that the combined application of the methods maximizes this potential. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
author2 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wunderlich, Tina
Wilken, Dennis
Andersen, Jasmin
Rabbel, Wolfgang
Zori, Davide
Kalmring, Sven
Byock, Jesse
spellingShingle Wunderlich, Tina
Wilken, Dennis
Andersen, Jasmin
Rabbel, Wolfgang
Zori, Davide
Kalmring, Sven
Byock, Jesse
On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland
author_facet Wunderlich, Tina
Wilken, Dennis
Andersen, Jasmin
Rabbel, Wolfgang
Zori, Davide
Kalmring, Sven
Byock, Jesse
author_sort Wunderlich, Tina
title On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland
title_short On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland
title_full On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland
title_fullStr On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland
title_full_unstemmed On the Ability of Geophysical Methods to Image Medieval Turf Buildings in Iceland
title_sort on the ability of geophysical methods to image medieval turf buildings in iceland
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.1506
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Farp.1506
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/arp.1506
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Archaeological Prospection
volume 22, issue 3, page 171-186
ISSN 1075-2196 1099-0763
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1506
container_title Archaeological Prospection
container_volume 22
container_issue 3
container_start_page 171
op_container_end_page 186
_version_ 1802645849695584256