High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea

Abstract The Baltic Proper harbour porpoise population is listed as Critically Endangered by IUCN, and only a few hundred animals remain. One of the most serious threats to this population is bycatch in static net fisheries. To minimize bycatch, ICES has proposed that acoustic deterrent devices, pin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Main Authors: Carlén, Ida, Cosentino, Mel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3932
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aqc.3932
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/aqc.3932
id crwiley:10.1002/aqc.3932
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/aqc.3932 2024-06-02T08:07:47+00:00 High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea Carlén, Ida Cosentino, Mel 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3932 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aqc.3932 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/aqc.3932 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems volume 33, issue 4, page 389-396 ISSN 1052-7613 1099-0755 journal-article 2023 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3932 2024-05-03T11:04:00Z Abstract The Baltic Proper harbour porpoise population is listed as Critically Endangered by IUCN, and only a few hundred animals remain. One of the most serious threats to this population is bycatch in static net fisheries. To minimize bycatch, ICES has proposed that acoustic deterrent devices, pingers, should be used on static nets within the population’s range. However, there have previously been indications that grey seals learn to associate the pinger sounds with the presence of nets with easily accessible prey, and that pinger use therefore can increase the risk of seal depredation in static net fisheries. In recent years, pingers operating at higher frequencies have been made commercially available, the idea being that harbour porpoises will still be able to hear the sound at 50–120 kHz while this will be above or at the limit of seal hearing. This would mean that such high‐frequency pingers would not induce this so‐called dinner‐bell effect. In this study, data were collected from active commercial static net fisheries in the Baltic Proper, using two types of high‐frequency pingers operating at 50–120 and 70 kHz, respectively. Pingers were attached to nets in accordance with manufacturers’ guidelines, and fishers were asked to estimate the catch loss owing to seals in nets with and without pingers. Data were received from 646 deployments made between May 2019 and September 2020. Four generalized mixed effect models were developed with relevant variables. The results suggest using high‐frequency pingers does not increase seal depredation on static nets. It is concluded that pingers could be used as an interim measure to minimize bycatch of the Critically Endangered Baltic Proper harbour porpoise population. Article in Journal/Newspaper Harbour porpoise Wiley Online Library Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 33 4 389 396
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract The Baltic Proper harbour porpoise population is listed as Critically Endangered by IUCN, and only a few hundred animals remain. One of the most serious threats to this population is bycatch in static net fisheries. To minimize bycatch, ICES has proposed that acoustic deterrent devices, pingers, should be used on static nets within the population’s range. However, there have previously been indications that grey seals learn to associate the pinger sounds with the presence of nets with easily accessible prey, and that pinger use therefore can increase the risk of seal depredation in static net fisheries. In recent years, pingers operating at higher frequencies have been made commercially available, the idea being that harbour porpoises will still be able to hear the sound at 50–120 kHz while this will be above or at the limit of seal hearing. This would mean that such high‐frequency pingers would not induce this so‐called dinner‐bell effect. In this study, data were collected from active commercial static net fisheries in the Baltic Proper, using two types of high‐frequency pingers operating at 50–120 and 70 kHz, respectively. Pingers were attached to nets in accordance with manufacturers’ guidelines, and fishers were asked to estimate the catch loss owing to seals in nets with and without pingers. Data were received from 646 deployments made between May 2019 and September 2020. Four generalized mixed effect models were developed with relevant variables. The results suggest using high‐frequency pingers does not increase seal depredation on static nets. It is concluded that pingers could be used as an interim measure to minimize bycatch of the Critically Endangered Baltic Proper harbour porpoise population.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Carlén, Ida
Cosentino, Mel
spellingShingle Carlén, Ida
Cosentino, Mel
High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea
author_facet Carlén, Ida
Cosentino, Mel
author_sort Carlén, Ida
title High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea
title_short High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea
title_full High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea
title_fullStr High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea
title_full_unstemmed High‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the Baltic Sea
title_sort high‐frequency pingers do not increase catch loss owing to seals in the baltic sea
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3932
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aqc.3932
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/aqc.3932
genre Harbour porpoise
genre_facet Harbour porpoise
op_source Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
volume 33, issue 4, page 389-396
ISSN 1052-7613 1099-0755
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3932
container_title Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
container_volume 33
container_issue 4
container_start_page 389
op_container_end_page 396
_version_ 1800752904888385536