User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework

Abstract Background Assistive technologies show promising features to support people with cognitive impairment in daily life, e.g. mobile sensors for falls detection. But adoption of the rapidly evolving technologies is still limited in practice. We applied user‐centered design to investigate factor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alzheimer's & Dementia
Main Authors: Rong, Eleonora, Köhler, Stefanie, Bieber, Gerald, Teipel, Stefan, Goerss, Doreen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.060553
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/alz.060553
id crwiley:10.1002/alz.060553
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/alz.060553 2024-06-02T08:14:05+00:00 User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework Rong, Eleonora Köhler, Stefanie Bieber, Gerald Teipel, Stefan Goerss, Doreen 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.060553 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/alz.060553 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Alzheimer's & Dementia volume 18, issue S8 ISSN 1552-5260 1552-5279 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.060553 2024-05-03T11:50:42Z Abstract Background Assistive technologies show promising features to support people with cognitive impairment in daily life, e.g. mobile sensors for falls detection. But adoption of the rapidly evolving technologies is still limited in practice. We applied user‐centered design to investigate factors contributing or hindering successful interventions on smartwatches. Methods We previously presented data from qualitative studies which analyzed values and needs for assistive technologies. In this subsequent study, we included patients with MCI and dementia. To prevent participants from feeling overwhelmed, we accompanied participants during a test intervention (0). Patients’ reactions to the following two tasks delivered by the smartwatch were observed remotely via cameras: A) drinking some water, as a task related to nursing and B) circling bells on a worksheet, as an occupational task. We also implemented two different intervention‐intensities: 1) regular and 2) intensive, with respect to vibration, alarm sounds and instructions. User feedback was obtained with questionnaires. Here, we present data of the feasibility analysis after completion of n = 20 patient, randomly assigned to intensity level 1 or 2 (n = 10/10). All patients were confronted with both tasks in the respective intensity, repeated up to three times in case of failure. Results As result of discussions in interdisciplinary working groups, we decided for a “wizard‐of‐oz setting”, which means controlling the smartwatch manually by a smartphone used as remote control. Systematic debriefing revealed obstacles in all study phases. On user side the problem of varying use of glasses and hearing aids couldn’t be overcome. On the technical side pairing problems (connection of phone and watch), automatically reduced brightness of smartwatch display and complicated maintenance of hardware were critical problems. Patients were committed to give feedback and felt not stressed due to the study. Still, filling in the questionnaires with Likert scales was ... Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Wiley Online Library Alzheimer's & Dementia 18 S8
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Background Assistive technologies show promising features to support people with cognitive impairment in daily life, e.g. mobile sensors for falls detection. But adoption of the rapidly evolving technologies is still limited in practice. We applied user‐centered design to investigate factors contributing or hindering successful interventions on smartwatches. Methods We previously presented data from qualitative studies which analyzed values and needs for assistive technologies. In this subsequent study, we included patients with MCI and dementia. To prevent participants from feeling overwhelmed, we accompanied participants during a test intervention (0). Patients’ reactions to the following two tasks delivered by the smartwatch were observed remotely via cameras: A) drinking some water, as a task related to nursing and B) circling bells on a worksheet, as an occupational task. We also implemented two different intervention‐intensities: 1) regular and 2) intensive, with respect to vibration, alarm sounds and instructions. User feedback was obtained with questionnaires. Here, we present data of the feasibility analysis after completion of n = 20 patient, randomly assigned to intensity level 1 or 2 (n = 10/10). All patients were confronted with both tasks in the respective intensity, repeated up to three times in case of failure. Results As result of discussions in interdisciplinary working groups, we decided for a “wizard‐of‐oz setting”, which means controlling the smartwatch manually by a smartphone used as remote control. Systematic debriefing revealed obstacles in all study phases. On user side the problem of varying use of glasses and hearing aids couldn’t be overcome. On the technical side pairing problems (connection of phone and watch), automatically reduced brightness of smartwatch display and complicated maintenance of hardware were critical problems. Patients were committed to give feedback and felt not stressed due to the study. Still, filling in the questionnaires with Likert scales was ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rong, Eleonora
Köhler, Stefanie
Bieber, Gerald
Teipel, Stefan
Goerss, Doreen
spellingShingle Rong, Eleonora
Köhler, Stefanie
Bieber, Gerald
Teipel, Stefan
Goerss, Doreen
User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework
author_facet Rong, Eleonora
Köhler, Stefanie
Bieber, Gerald
Teipel, Stefan
Goerss, Doreen
author_sort Rong, Eleonora
title User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework
title_short User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework
title_full User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework
title_fullStr User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework
title_full_unstemmed User‐centered design to examine interaction of people with MCI or dementia with smartwatches: the SAMi intervention study framework
title_sort user‐centered design to examine interaction of people with mci or dementia with smartwatches: the sami intervention study framework
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.060553
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/alz.060553
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_source Alzheimer's & Dementia
volume 18, issue S8
ISSN 1552-5260 1552-5279
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.060553
container_title Alzheimer's & Dementia
container_volume 18
container_issue S8
_version_ 1800737798626476032