Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine current physiotherapy practice for managing chronic low back pain (LBP). Method: We administered a cross-sectional survey to all physiotherapists working in Eastern Health (EH) Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador, by email. To asce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy Canada
Main Authors: Hall, Amanda, Penney, Tracy, Simmons, Kathy, Peters, Nicole, O’Brien, Dana, Richmond, Helen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
id crunivtoronpr:10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
record_format openpolar
spelling crunivtoronpr:10.3138/ptc-2020-0078 2024-09-15T18:20:11+00:00 Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices Hall, Amanda Penney, Tracy Simmons, Kathy Peters, Nicole O’Brien, Dana Richmond, Helen 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078 https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078 en eng University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) Physiotherapy Canada volume 74, issue 1, page 66-74 ISSN 0300-0508 1708-8313 journal-article 2022 crunivtoronpr https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078 2024-08-29T04:20:48Z Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine current physiotherapy practice for managing chronic low back pain (LBP). Method: We administered a cross-sectional survey to all physiotherapists working in Eastern Health (EH) Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador, by email. To ascertain how physiotherapists assessed and treated patients with LBP, the survey included multiple-choice and open-ended questions, along with case vignettes. We explored the respondents’ confidence about implementing all aspects of guideline-based care, as well as their use of treatment outcome measures. Results: A total of 76 physiotherapists responded to the survey (84% response rate); 56 (74%) reported that they treated patients with LBP as part of their regular practice. More than half had managed LBP for more than 10 years. The most frequently used treatments were self-management advice, followed by home and supervised exercise. The majority of respondents lacked confidence about implementing cognitive–behavioural treatment techniques. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was the most commonly used outcome measure; disability outcome measures were not frequently used. Conclusions: The majority of LBP management in EH aligns with guideline recommendations. Increased uptake of guidelines recommending assessment and management of LBP using a bio-psychosocial approach will require training and support. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press) Physiotherapy Canada e20200078
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press)
op_collection_id crunivtoronpr
language English
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine current physiotherapy practice for managing chronic low back pain (LBP). Method: We administered a cross-sectional survey to all physiotherapists working in Eastern Health (EH) Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador, by email. To ascertain how physiotherapists assessed and treated patients with LBP, the survey included multiple-choice and open-ended questions, along with case vignettes. We explored the respondents’ confidence about implementing all aspects of guideline-based care, as well as their use of treatment outcome measures. Results: A total of 76 physiotherapists responded to the survey (84% response rate); 56 (74%) reported that they treated patients with LBP as part of their regular practice. More than half had managed LBP for more than 10 years. The most frequently used treatments were self-management advice, followed by home and supervised exercise. The majority of respondents lacked confidence about implementing cognitive–behavioural treatment techniques. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was the most commonly used outcome measure; disability outcome measures were not frequently used. Conclusions: The majority of LBP management in EH aligns with guideline recommendations. Increased uptake of guidelines recommending assessment and management of LBP using a bio-psychosocial approach will require training and support.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hall, Amanda
Penney, Tracy
Simmons, Kathy
Peters, Nicole
O’Brien, Dana
Richmond, Helen
spellingShingle Hall, Amanda
Penney, Tracy
Simmons, Kathy
Peters, Nicole
O’Brien, Dana
Richmond, Helen
Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices
author_facet Hall, Amanda
Penney, Tracy
Simmons, Kathy
Peters, Nicole
O’Brien, Dana
Richmond, Helen
author_sort Hall, Amanda
title Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices
title_short Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices
title_full Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices
title_fullStr Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices
title_full_unstemmed Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists’ Current Assessment and Treatment Practices
title_sort physical therapy management of low back pain: a survey of physiotherapists’ current assessment and treatment practices
publisher University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source Physiotherapy Canada
volume 74, issue 1, page 66-74
ISSN 0300-0508 1708-8313
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
container_title Physiotherapy Canada
container_start_page e20200078
_version_ 1810458553406717952