Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands

The 2015 election of the New Democratic Party (NDP) in Alberta and the NDP government’s commitment to implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has opened up new possibilities for reforming the province’s relationship with First Nations and Métis communities. Al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Canadian Studies
Main Author: Mills, Jennifer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153
id crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs.51.1.153
record_format openpolar
spelling crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs.51.1.153 2024-09-15T18:06:34+00:00 Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands Mills, Jennifer 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153 https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153 en eng University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) Journal of Canadian Studies volume 51, issue 1, page 153-185 ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251 journal-article 2017 crunivtoronpr https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153 2024-08-08T04:25:50Z The 2015 election of the New Democratic Party (NDP) in Alberta and the NDP government’s commitment to implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has opened up new possibilities for reforming the province’s relationship with First Nations and Métis communities. Alberta’s tar sands regulatory process and consultation policy with Indigenous peoples, however, has so far remained the same, and the provincial government continues to support expanding the industry. This article argues that the 2014 Consultation Guidelines imposed by the previous Progressive Conservative government severely limit the participation rights of Indigenous peoples and violate treaty rights by not adequately addressing cumulative impacts. Despite sustained critique by legal scholars and Indigenous communities, previous reforms to the consultation system have not substantively addressed their concerns. In response, several First Nations in Alberta have launched legal actions challenging both the consultation regime and specific project approvals. Following a discussion of consultation and consent in Canada, the article uses recent legal cases to illustrate how Indigenous peoples in Alberta have been excluded from key decision-making around the oil industry. Finally, it considers how the regulatory process must change to respect Indigenous rights and self-determination. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press) Journal of Canadian Studies 51 1 153 185
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press)
op_collection_id crunivtoronpr
language English
description The 2015 election of the New Democratic Party (NDP) in Alberta and the NDP government’s commitment to implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has opened up new possibilities for reforming the province’s relationship with First Nations and Métis communities. Alberta’s tar sands regulatory process and consultation policy with Indigenous peoples, however, has so far remained the same, and the provincial government continues to support expanding the industry. This article argues that the 2014 Consultation Guidelines imposed by the previous Progressive Conservative government severely limit the participation rights of Indigenous peoples and violate treaty rights by not adequately addressing cumulative impacts. Despite sustained critique by legal scholars and Indigenous communities, previous reforms to the consultation system have not substantively addressed their concerns. In response, several First Nations in Alberta have launched legal actions challenging both the consultation regime and specific project approvals. Following a discussion of consultation and consent in Canada, the article uses recent legal cases to illustrate how Indigenous peoples in Alberta have been excluded from key decision-making around the oil industry. Finally, it considers how the regulatory process must change to respect Indigenous rights and self-determination.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mills, Jennifer
spellingShingle Mills, Jennifer
Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands
author_facet Mills, Jennifer
author_sort Mills, Jennifer
title Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands
title_short Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands
title_full Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands
title_fullStr Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands
title_full_unstemmed Destabilizing the Consultation Framework in Alberta’s Tar Sands
title_sort destabilizing the consultation framework in alberta’s tar sands
publisher University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Journal of Canadian Studies
volume 51, issue 1, page 153-185
ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.51.1.153
container_title Journal of Canadian Studies
container_volume 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 153
op_container_end_page 185
_version_ 1810443984512745472