Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery

Míkmaq began to sell their furs to Europeans more than four centuries ago, while contending directly and often violently with Europeans for the control of Atlantic fishing grounds. Although Míkmaq were slowly displaced and reduced to destitution by settlers, they continued to hunt, fish and trap on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Canadian Studies
Main Author: Barsh, Russel Lawrence
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15
id crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs.37.1.15
record_format openpolar
spelling crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs.37.1.15 2024-06-23T07:54:38+00:00 Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery Barsh, Russel Lawrence 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15 https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15 en eng University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) Journal of Canadian Studies volume 37, issue 1, page 15-42 ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251 journal-article 2002 crunivtoronpr https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15 2024-05-30T08:22:34Z Míkmaq began to sell their furs to Europeans more than four centuries ago, while contending directly and often violently with Europeans for the control of Atlantic fishing grounds. Although Míkmaq were slowly displaced and reduced to destitution by settlers, they continued to hunt, fish and trap on a reduced scale and remained largely independent until the 1960s, when new federal licensing regimes for fishing contributed to a surge of Míkmaw nationalism. Since 1985, Canadian courts have repeatedly vindicated Míkmaw treaty hunting, fishing and trading rights, including offshore rights, culminating in a 1999 Canadian Supreme Court ruling affirming their right to secure a “moderate livelihood” by fishing commercially. Ottawa continues to try to regulate the Míkmaw fishery, however, and this resulted in sporadic violence during the 2000 and 2001 fishing seasons. Meanwhile, commercial groundfish and herring stocks in the region have collapsed, and salmon are threatened with extinction. This ecological and economic disaster has been the focus of a public relations war over responsible fishing between federal bureaucrats and Míkmaq. For the Míkmaq, netukulimk symbolizes their capacity to do a better job of conservation. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has responded by asserting its “scientific” superiority. This article reviews the evidence for responsible Míkmaw use of living resources through the early nineteenth century, when Míkmaq became demographically and economically marginalized, and the evidence for overfishing and mismanagement of Atlantic fisheries in the twentieth century. Although the conditions that made Míkmaq fishing self-regulating no longer exist, the federal management regime is even more of a threat to the survival of fish stocks and fishing communities. Article in Journal/Newspaper Míkmaq University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press) Canada Journal of Canadian Studies 37 1 15 42
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press)
op_collection_id crunivtoronpr
language English
description Míkmaq began to sell their furs to Europeans more than four centuries ago, while contending directly and often violently with Europeans for the control of Atlantic fishing grounds. Although Míkmaq were slowly displaced and reduced to destitution by settlers, they continued to hunt, fish and trap on a reduced scale and remained largely independent until the 1960s, when new federal licensing regimes for fishing contributed to a surge of Míkmaw nationalism. Since 1985, Canadian courts have repeatedly vindicated Míkmaw treaty hunting, fishing and trading rights, including offshore rights, culminating in a 1999 Canadian Supreme Court ruling affirming their right to secure a “moderate livelihood” by fishing commercially. Ottawa continues to try to regulate the Míkmaw fishery, however, and this resulted in sporadic violence during the 2000 and 2001 fishing seasons. Meanwhile, commercial groundfish and herring stocks in the region have collapsed, and salmon are threatened with extinction. This ecological and economic disaster has been the focus of a public relations war over responsible fishing between federal bureaucrats and Míkmaq. For the Míkmaq, netukulimk symbolizes their capacity to do a better job of conservation. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has responded by asserting its “scientific” superiority. This article reviews the evidence for responsible Míkmaw use of living resources through the early nineteenth century, when Míkmaq became demographically and economically marginalized, and the evidence for overfishing and mismanagement of Atlantic fisheries in the twentieth century. Although the conditions that made Míkmaq fishing self-regulating no longer exist, the federal management regime is even more of a threat to the survival of fish stocks and fishing communities.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Barsh, Russel Lawrence
spellingShingle Barsh, Russel Lawrence
Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery
author_facet Barsh, Russel Lawrence
author_sort Barsh, Russel Lawrence
title Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery
title_short Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery
title_full Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery
title_fullStr Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery
title_full_unstemmed Netukulimk Past and Present: Míkmaw Ethics and the Atlantic Fishery
title_sort netukulimk past and present: míkmaw ethics and the atlantic fishery
publisher University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Míkmaq
genre_facet Míkmaq
op_source Journal of Canadian Studies
volume 37, issue 1, page 15-42
ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.37.1.15
container_title Journal of Canadian Studies
container_volume 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
op_container_end_page 42
_version_ 1802646858837786624