“Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900

Throughout the 1880s and 1890s, two First Nations groups—the Chippewa of the Thames and the Six Nations of the Grand River—attempted to evict two other First Nations groups—the Munsee of the Thames and the Mississauga of the Credit—from the Thames and Grand River reserves in southern Ontario. These...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Canadian Studies
Main Author: Reid, Darren
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022
_version_ 1821513160110112768
author Reid, Darren
author_facet Reid, Darren
author_sort Reid, Darren
collection University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press)
container_title Journal of Canadian Studies
description Throughout the 1880s and 1890s, two First Nations groups—the Chippewa of the Thames and the Six Nations of the Grand River—attempted to evict two other First Nations groups—the Munsee of the Thames and the Mississauga of the Credit—from the Thames and Grand River reserves in southern Ontario. These land disputes were successfully resolved by the turn of the twentieth century and no evictions did take place, but the 20 years of conflict are revealing of the complexities, contingencies, and evolutions of dispossession in Canada over the nineteenth century. This article presents a narrative of these attempted evictions and proposes the concept of “compound dispossession” as a means of grappling with these complexities. It is argued that compound dispossession not only captures the snowballing complications of historical dispossessions over time, but also captures the imbrication of multiple disparate trajectories of dispossession as the pressures of settler land hunger and encroachments on Indigenous sovereignty in the late nineteenth century bore down on four neighbouring First Nations groups simultaneously. Rather than interpreting these conflicts through a binary of assimilation/resistance, compound dispossession suggests the pervasiveness of dispossession as a discourse and the agency of dispossession as an adaptation to the unfolding settler-colonial paradigm.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
id crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs-2022-0022
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id crunivtoronpr
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022
op_source Journal of Canadian Studies
volume 57, issue 1, page 81-113
ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251
publishDate 2023
publisher University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
record_format openpolar
spelling crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs-2022-0022 2025-01-16T21:54:39+00:00 “Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900 Reid, Darren 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022 https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022 en eng University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) Journal of Canadian Studies volume 57, issue 1, page 81-113 ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251 History Cultural Studies journal-article 2023 crunivtoronpr https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022 2023-12-05T17:31:21Z Throughout the 1880s and 1890s, two First Nations groups—the Chippewa of the Thames and the Six Nations of the Grand River—attempted to evict two other First Nations groups—the Munsee of the Thames and the Mississauga of the Credit—from the Thames and Grand River reserves in southern Ontario. These land disputes were successfully resolved by the turn of the twentieth century and no evictions did take place, but the 20 years of conflict are revealing of the complexities, contingencies, and evolutions of dispossession in Canada over the nineteenth century. This article presents a narrative of these attempted evictions and proposes the concept of “compound dispossession” as a means of grappling with these complexities. It is argued that compound dispossession not only captures the snowballing complications of historical dispossessions over time, but also captures the imbrication of multiple disparate trajectories of dispossession as the pressures of settler land hunger and encroachments on Indigenous sovereignty in the late nineteenth century bore down on four neighbouring First Nations groups simultaneously. Rather than interpreting these conflicts through a binary of assimilation/resistance, compound dispossession suggests the pervasiveness of dispossession as a discourse and the agency of dispossession as an adaptation to the unfolding settler-colonial paradigm. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press) Canada Journal of Canadian Studies
spellingShingle History
Cultural Studies
Reid, Darren
“Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900
title “Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900
title_full “Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900
title_fullStr “Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900
title_full_unstemmed “Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900
title_short “Compound Dispossession” in Southern Ontario: Converging Trajectories of Colonial Dispossession and Inter-Indigenous Conflict, 1886–1900
title_sort “compound dispossession” in southern ontario: converging trajectories of colonial dispossession and inter-indigenous conflict, 1886–1900
topic History
Cultural Studies
topic_facet History
Cultural Studies
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs-2022-0022