Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873

This article argues that public debt financing facilitated the appropriation of the territories of Indigenous nations in the British settler colonies and does so through a detailed examination of Prince Edward Island’s public debt. The island’s government used public debt financing as a technique to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Canadian Studies
Main Author: Tozer, Angela
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009
id crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs-2022-0009
record_format openpolar
spelling crunivtoronpr:10.3138/jcs-2022-0009 2023-12-31T10:09:16+01:00 Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873 Tozer, Angela 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009 https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009 en eng University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) Journal of Canadian Studies volume 57, issue 2, page 233-254 ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251 History Cultural Studies journal-article 2023 crunivtoronpr https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009 2023-12-01T08:18:27Z This article argues that public debt financing facilitated the appropriation of the territories of Indigenous nations in the British settler colonies and does so through a detailed examination of Prince Edward Island’s public debt. The island’s government used public debt financing as a technique to direct capital into the colony, but to receive loans, the colonial government first needed credit. Settler-colonial credit derived from colonial governments’ claiming the territories of Indigenous nations as government assets. This history highlights the deeply racial characteristics embedded in the expansion of global public debt financing that characterized finance capitalism beginning in the 1820s. In this way, the unique history of the island and its “land question” can be placed into the broader global context of debt markets and processes of racial capital. Specifically, the 1853 Land Purchase Act used public borrowing to purchase lands from British landowners so that the island’s government could hold the land title. British landowners had their ownership rights secured despite the eighteenth-century Peace and Friendship Treaties that guaranteed the Mi’kmaq nation rights to their territory, which included Epekwitk, what the British named Prince Edward Island. Article in Journal/Newspaper Mi’kmaq Prince Edward Island University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press - via Crossref) Journal of Canadian Studies 57 2 233 254
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press - via Crossref)
op_collection_id crunivtoronpr
language English
topic History
Cultural Studies
spellingShingle History
Cultural Studies
Tozer, Angela
Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873
topic_facet History
Cultural Studies
description This article argues that public debt financing facilitated the appropriation of the territories of Indigenous nations in the British settler colonies and does so through a detailed examination of Prince Edward Island’s public debt. The island’s government used public debt financing as a technique to direct capital into the colony, but to receive loans, the colonial government first needed credit. Settler-colonial credit derived from colonial governments’ claiming the territories of Indigenous nations as government assets. This history highlights the deeply racial characteristics embedded in the expansion of global public debt financing that characterized finance capitalism beginning in the 1820s. In this way, the unique history of the island and its “land question” can be placed into the broader global context of debt markets and processes of racial capital. Specifically, the 1853 Land Purchase Act used public borrowing to purchase lands from British landowners so that the island’s government could hold the land title. British landowners had their ownership rights secured despite the eighteenth-century Peace and Friendship Treaties that guaranteed the Mi’kmaq nation rights to their territory, which included Epekwitk, what the British named Prince Edward Island.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tozer, Angela
author_facet Tozer, Angela
author_sort Tozer, Angela
title Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873
title_short Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873
title_full Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873
title_fullStr Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873
title_full_unstemmed Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873
title_sort racial capital, public debt, and the appropriation of epekwitk, 1853–1873
publisher University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009
genre Mi’kmaq
Prince Edward Island
genre_facet Mi’kmaq
Prince Edward Island
op_source Journal of Canadian Studies
volume 57, issue 2, page 233-254
ISSN 0021-9495 1911-0251
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0009
container_title Journal of Canadian Studies
container_volume 57
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
op_container_end_page 254
_version_ 1786842317113524224