Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days

Abstract: The Aboriginal population around Banff National Park was in many ways restricted from its boundaries shortly after its creation. However, Aboriginal people – in particular the Stoney (Nakoda) – would return en masse once a year to participate in the Banff Indian Days. While ethnographic ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Historical Review
Main Author: Clapperton, Jonathan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/chr.1188
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/chr.1188
id crunivtoronpr:10.3138/chr.1188
record_format openpolar
spelling crunivtoronpr:10.3138/chr.1188 2023-12-31T10:09:21+01:00 Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days Clapperton, Jonathan 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/chr.1188 https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/chr.1188 en eng University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) Canadian Historical Review volume 94, issue 3, page 349-379 ISSN 0008-3755 1710-1093 Religious studies History journal-article 2013 crunivtoronpr https://doi.org/10.3138/chr.1188 2023-12-01T08:18:15Z Abstract: The Aboriginal population around Banff National Park was in many ways restricted from its boundaries shortly after its creation. However, Aboriginal people – in particular the Stoney (Nakoda) – would return en masse once a year to participate in the Banff Indian Days. While ethnographic expositions and spectacles have received much attention from social and cultural historians, the Banff Indian Days differ in that they occurred within an atmosphere saturated by an ideology of nature conservation. Drawing on photographs, advertising posters, archival materials, and oral recordings, this article argues that the Banff Indian Days were a physical manifestation of a much broader (indeed ongoing) dialogue, renegotiated and performed annually, between Natives and newcomers over the conditions under which Aboriginal peoples would be included within Canada's burgeoning parks and protected areas. Ultimately, the relationships between Natives and Indian Days organizers, park staff, Banff residents, and spectators resulting from this discussion were ambivalent. For non-Native organizers and spectators, the Indian Days provided a means to show how Natives could be safely, though only temporarily, restored to the park's environ. Enclosing Aboriginal participants within outsider representations and restricting them to supposedly regimented schedules, non-Natives believed Aboriginals posed a threat neither to established social hierarchies nor to the environment. Yet Native participants proved autonomous and unpredictable. They consistently mocked and subverted many of the race, class, and gender boundaries that Indian Days organizers never envisioned them crossing. In doing so, they attempted to expand their role within the national park system specifically and within a settler-colonial society more broadly. Article in Journal/Newspaper Nakoda stoney University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press - via Crossref) Canadian Historical Review 94 3 349 379
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto Press (U Toronto Press - via Crossref)
op_collection_id crunivtoronpr
language English
topic Religious studies
History
spellingShingle Religious studies
History
Clapperton, Jonathan
Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days
topic_facet Religious studies
History
description Abstract: The Aboriginal population around Banff National Park was in many ways restricted from its boundaries shortly after its creation. However, Aboriginal people – in particular the Stoney (Nakoda) – would return en masse once a year to participate in the Banff Indian Days. While ethnographic expositions and spectacles have received much attention from social and cultural historians, the Banff Indian Days differ in that they occurred within an atmosphere saturated by an ideology of nature conservation. Drawing on photographs, advertising posters, archival materials, and oral recordings, this article argues that the Banff Indian Days were a physical manifestation of a much broader (indeed ongoing) dialogue, renegotiated and performed annually, between Natives and newcomers over the conditions under which Aboriginal peoples would be included within Canada's burgeoning parks and protected areas. Ultimately, the relationships between Natives and Indian Days organizers, park staff, Banff residents, and spectators resulting from this discussion were ambivalent. For non-Native organizers and spectators, the Indian Days provided a means to show how Natives could be safely, though only temporarily, restored to the park's environ. Enclosing Aboriginal participants within outsider representations and restricting them to supposedly regimented schedules, non-Natives believed Aboriginals posed a threat neither to established social hierarchies nor to the environment. Yet Native participants proved autonomous and unpredictable. They consistently mocked and subverted many of the race, class, and gender boundaries that Indian Days organizers never envisioned them crossing. In doing so, they attempted to expand their role within the national park system specifically and within a settler-colonial society more broadly.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Clapperton, Jonathan
author_facet Clapperton, Jonathan
author_sort Clapperton, Jonathan
title Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days
title_short Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days
title_full Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days
title_fullStr Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days
title_full_unstemmed Naturalizing Race Relations: Conservation, Colonialism, and Spectacle at the Banff Indian Days
title_sort naturalizing race relations: conservation, colonialism, and spectacle at the banff indian days
publisher University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/chr.1188
https://utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/chr.1188
genre Nakoda
stoney
genre_facet Nakoda
stoney
op_source Canadian Historical Review
volume 94, issue 3, page 349-379
ISSN 0008-3755 1710-1093
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3138/chr.1188
container_title Canadian Historical Review
container_volume 94
container_issue 3
container_start_page 349
op_container_end_page 379
_version_ 1786842484564819968