Where are the people? A scoping review on the use of the term “resilience” in Arctic health research and its relevance to community expressions of well-being

• Published in: Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
• Main Authors: Cueva, Katie, Akearok, Gwen Healey, Guistini, Sean, Kanayurak, Nicole, Larsen, Christina V. L., Lavoie, Josee, Rink, Elizabeth, Stoor, Jon Petter A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: University of California Press 2021
• Subjects: Arctic; Arctic Council; Climate change
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2019.00077; http://online.ucpress.edu/elementa/article-pdf/doi/10.1525/elementa.2019.00077/474492/elementa.2019.00077.pdf

In the field of Arctic health, “resilience” is a concept used to describe the capacity to recover from adversities. The term is widely used in Arctic policy contexts; however, Arctic peoples and communities question whether “resilience” is an appropriate term to describe the human dimensions of health and well-being in the Arctic as it is currently applied. A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature was conducted. We used searchable databases, Google Scholar, and Dartmouth College Library Services, to select studies conducted between 2000 and 2019 and key documents from the Arctic Council and other relevant organization and government entities. A scoping review framework was followed, and consultation among the authors provided initial scope, direction, and verification of findings. Analyses identified over- and underrepresented key thematic areas in the literature on human resilience in Arctic communities. Areas of overrepresentation in the literature included ecosystem, climate change, and environmental sciences. Areas that were underrepresented in the literature included health, medicine, wellness or well-being, and community voices on the topic of human resilience. Results indicated that “resilience” as a concept was applied across a diversity of contexts and subject areas in the Arctic and that this may have repercussions for understanding the human dimension of “resilience” and community expressions of well-being. Alternative terms and concepts with which Northern community members more closely identify could be used to more respectfully and accurately advance research in areas such as epidemiology, community health and well-being, and particularly Indigenous peoples’ health.