C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report

Introduction Refractory occipital neuralgia is a difficult medical condition, especially when the patient has already been submitted to occipital nerve neurectomy and radiofrequency rhizotomy. There is no case report of spinal cord stimulation in the C1-C4 cervical segments for this condition. Objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery
Main Authors: Malheiros, José, Cancado, Sergio, Oliveira, Célia, Santos, Wancler
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604177
http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0037-1604177.pdf
id crthieme:10.1055/s-0037-1604177
record_format openpolar
spelling crthieme:10.1055/s-0037-1604177 2024-05-19T07:48:05+00:00 C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report Malheiros, José Cancado, Sergio Oliveira, Célia Santos, Wancler 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604177 http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0037-1604177.pdf en eng Georg Thieme Verlag KG https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery volume 36, issue 03, page 200-202 ISSN 0103-5355 2359-5922 journal-article 2017 crthieme https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604177 2024-05-01T07:16:02Z Introduction Refractory occipital neuralgia is a difficult medical condition, especially when the patient has already been submitted to occipital nerve neurectomy and radiofrequency rhizotomy. There is no case report of spinal cord stimulation in the C1-C4 cervical segments for this condition. Objective To evaluate if C1-C4 dorsal spinal cord stimulation is effective in a patient with refractory occipital neuralgia who was already submitted to neurectomy and rhizotomy. Methods After obtaining the approval from the Ethics Committee of one of our institutions, a unilateral laminectomy was performed between C3 and C4, and a neurostimulator lead was conducted until the posterior portion of the C1 arc was in full view. Then we performed an intraoperative test to evaluate the correspondence between pain location and stimulation-induced paresthesias. We could not put the subcutaneous lead for such condition because of the scar tissue of the area and the previous neurectomy. Results After one year of follow up, we noticed a dramatic improvement in pain control, as well as medication withdrawal. The score of the visual analogue scale was 9 before the surgery, and it dropped to 2 after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusion Spinal cord stimulation between the C1 and C4 cervical segments can be an option for selected cases of refractory occipital neuralgia, including those patients who have already been submitted to neurectomy or rhizotomy. Article in Journal/Newspaper SCAR Thieme Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 36 03 200 202
institution Open Polar
collection Thieme
op_collection_id crthieme
language English
description Introduction Refractory occipital neuralgia is a difficult medical condition, especially when the patient has already been submitted to occipital nerve neurectomy and radiofrequency rhizotomy. There is no case report of spinal cord stimulation in the C1-C4 cervical segments for this condition. Objective To evaluate if C1-C4 dorsal spinal cord stimulation is effective in a patient with refractory occipital neuralgia who was already submitted to neurectomy and rhizotomy. Methods After obtaining the approval from the Ethics Committee of one of our institutions, a unilateral laminectomy was performed between C3 and C4, and a neurostimulator lead was conducted until the posterior portion of the C1 arc was in full view. Then we performed an intraoperative test to evaluate the correspondence between pain location and stimulation-induced paresthesias. We could not put the subcutaneous lead for such condition because of the scar tissue of the area and the previous neurectomy. Results After one year of follow up, we noticed a dramatic improvement in pain control, as well as medication withdrawal. The score of the visual analogue scale was 9 before the surgery, and it dropped to 2 after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusion Spinal cord stimulation between the C1 and C4 cervical segments can be an option for selected cases of refractory occipital neuralgia, including those patients who have already been submitted to neurectomy or rhizotomy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Malheiros, José
Cancado, Sergio
Oliveira, Célia
Santos, Wancler
spellingShingle Malheiros, José
Cancado, Sergio
Oliveira, Célia
Santos, Wancler
C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report
author_facet Malheiros, José
Cancado, Sergio
Oliveira, Célia
Santos, Wancler
author_sort Malheiros, José
title C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report
title_short C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report
title_full C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report
title_fullStr C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report
title_full_unstemmed C1-C4 Dorsal Column Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia Treatment. Case Report
title_sort c1-c4 dorsal column stimulation for refractory occipital neuralgia treatment. case report
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604177
http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0037-1604177.pdf
genre SCAR
genre_facet SCAR
op_source Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery
volume 36, issue 03, page 200-202
ISSN 0103-5355 2359-5922
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604177
container_title Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery
container_volume 36
container_issue 03
container_start_page 200
op_container_end_page 202
_version_ 1799488572352364544