Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth

Enamel, the outer layer of the teeth of vertebrates, is the hardest tissue in their body. In general, enamel is highly mineralized and has a special ultrastructure that directs the mechanical properties of teeth and thereby their biological functions. However, there are differences between the ename...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials
Main Authors: Luebke, Alwina, Loza, Kateryna, Prymak, Oleg, Dammann, Philip, Fabritius, Helge Otto, Epple, Matthias
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Thomas Telford Ltd. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001
https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001
id crtelford:10.1680/jbibn.19.00001
record_format openpolar
spelling crtelford:10.1680/jbibn.19.00001 2023-05-15T17:59:54+02:00 Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth Luebke, Alwina Loza, Kateryna Prymak, Oleg Dammann, Philip Fabritius, Helge Otto Epple, Matthias 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001 https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001 en eng Thomas Telford Ltd. Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials volume 8, issue 4, page 247-253 ISSN 2045-9858 2045-9866 General Engineering Biomaterials journal-article 2019 crtelford https://doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001 2022-10-03T19:52:27Z Enamel, the outer layer of the teeth of vertebrates, is the hardest tissue in their body. In general, enamel is highly mineralized and has a special ultrastructure that directs the mechanical properties of teeth and thereby their biological functions. However, there are differences between the enamel ultrastructures of different species. The authors compare the teeth of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber, the African mole rat Fukomys kafuensis and the common pipistrelle bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus by high-resolution analytical methods, including scanning electron microscopy, quantitative wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction. The enamel of all animals consists of long, thin and differently oriented calcium phosphate crystallites (length > 1 µm; thickness about 50 nm). On the outer surface of the beaver tooth, a thin layer of brown iron oxide was found. The diameter of the dentin tubuli was between 1 and 3 µm for all species – that is, comparable to that for human teeth. Article in Journal/Newspaper Pipistrellus pipistrellus ICE Virtual Library (ICE Publishing - via Crossref) Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials 8 4 247 253
institution Open Polar
collection ICE Virtual Library (ICE Publishing - via Crossref)
op_collection_id crtelford
language English
topic General Engineering
Biomaterials
spellingShingle General Engineering
Biomaterials
Luebke, Alwina
Loza, Kateryna
Prymak, Oleg
Dammann, Philip
Fabritius, Helge Otto
Epple, Matthias
Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
topic_facet General Engineering
Biomaterials
description Enamel, the outer layer of the teeth of vertebrates, is the hardest tissue in their body. In general, enamel is highly mineralized and has a special ultrastructure that directs the mechanical properties of teeth and thereby their biological functions. However, there are differences between the enamel ultrastructures of different species. The authors compare the teeth of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber, the African mole rat Fukomys kafuensis and the common pipistrelle bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus by high-resolution analytical methods, including scanning electron microscopy, quantitative wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction. The enamel of all animals consists of long, thin and differently oriented calcium phosphate crystallites (length > 1 µm; thickness about 50 nm). On the outer surface of the beaver tooth, a thin layer of brown iron oxide was found. The diameter of the dentin tubuli was between 1 and 3 µm for all species – that is, comparable to that for human teeth.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Luebke, Alwina
Loza, Kateryna
Prymak, Oleg
Dammann, Philip
Fabritius, Helge Otto
Epple, Matthias
author_facet Luebke, Alwina
Loza, Kateryna
Prymak, Oleg
Dammann, Philip
Fabritius, Helge Otto
Epple, Matthias
author_sort Luebke, Alwina
title Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
title_short Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
title_full Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
title_fullStr Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
title_full_unstemmed Optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
title_sort optimized biological tools: ultrastructure of rodent and bat teeth compared to human teeth
publisher Thomas Telford Ltd.
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001
https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001
genre Pipistrellus pipistrellus
genre_facet Pipistrellus pipistrellus
op_source Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials
volume 8, issue 4, page 247-253
ISSN 2045-9858 2045-9866
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1680/jbibn.19.00001
container_title Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials
container_volume 8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 247
op_container_end_page 253
_version_ 1766168783602319360