Effects of bio-loggers on behaviour and corticosterone metabolites of Northern Bald Ibises (Geronticus eremita) in the field and in captivity

• Published in: Animal Biotelemetry
• Main Authors: Puehringer-Sturmayr, Verena, Loretto, Matthias-Claudio A., Hemetsberger, Josef, Czerny, Tanja, Gschwandegger, Johannes, Leitsberger, Madelaine, Kotrschal, Kurt, Frigerio, Didone
• Other Authors: OeAD-GmbH, Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft, Austrian Science Fund, Universität Wien, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020
• Subjects: Computer Networks and Communications; Instrumentation; Animal Science and Zoology; Signal Processing; Avian Studies
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40317-019-0191-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40317-019-0191-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40317-019-0191-5/fulltext.html

Abstract Background During the past decades, avian studies have profited from the development of miniature electronic devices that allow long-term and long-range monitoring. To ensure data quality and to inform understanding of possible impacts, it is necessary to test the effects of tagging. We investigated the influence of GPS-transmitters on the behaviour and physiology (levels of excreted corticosterone metabolites, CM) of an endangered bird species, the Northern Bald Ibis ( Geronticus eremita ). We considered effects of GPS-tags in two contexts: (1) aviary (i.e. in captivity), focussing on short-term effects of transmitters on locomotion, foraging and maintenance behaviour (20 individuals that differed in sex and age observed for 10 days) and (2) field, focussing on intermediate-term effects of transmitters on locomotion, foraging, maintenance behaviour, dorsal feather preening, social interactions and physiology (CM) (24 individuals observed for 79 days). In both contexts, focal animals were equipped with bio-logger backpacks mounted with a harness. Results In the aviary, behavioural observations were limited to the first days after tagging: no differences were found between individuals with GPS-tags and their controls with respect to the behavioural parameters considered. In the field, no behavioural differences were found between the GPS-tagged individuals and their controls; however, 1 month after tagging, individuals with GPS-tags excreted significantly more CM than their controls before returning to baseline levels. Conclusions Our results suggest that GPS-transmitters did not affect foraging, locomotion and maintenance behaviour in the Northern Bald Ibis in the short- or intermediate-term. However, they did affect the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal reactivity in the intermediate-term for 1 month before returning to baseline levels the next month. As the Northern Bald Ibis is listed as endangered, evaluating possible adverse effects of bio-logging is also relevant for potential conservation and reintroduction research.