Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk

Abstract Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia
Main Authors: Eccard, Jana A., Liesenjohann, Thilo, Dammhahn, Melanie
Other Authors: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Potsdam
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y.pdf
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y/fulltext.html
id crspringernat:10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y
record_format openpolar
spelling crspringernat:10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y 2023-05-15T17:12:38+02:00 Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk Eccard, Jana A. Liesenjohann, Thilo Dammhahn, Melanie Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Universität Potsdam 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y.pdf http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y/fulltext.html en eng Springer Science and Business Media LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY Oecologia volume 194, issue 4, page 621-634 ISSN 0029-8549 1432-1939 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2020 crspringernat https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y 2022-01-04T12:42:24Z Abstract Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and resource exploitation remain unexplained. Using single foragers in artificial landscapes of perceived risks and resources with diminishing returns, we aimed to test whether foraging behaviour and resource exploitation are adjusted to risk level, vary with risk during different components of foraging, and (co)vary among individuals. We quantified foraging behaviour and resource exploitation for 21 common voles ( Microtus arvalis ). By manipulating ground cover, we created simple landscapes of two food patches varying in perceived risk during feeding in a patch and/or while travelling between patches. Foraging of individuals was variable and adjusted to risk level and type. High risk during feeding reduced feeding duration and food consumption more strongly than risk while travelling. Risk during travelling modified the risk effects of feeding for changes between patches and resulting evenness of resource exploitation. Across risk conditions individuals differed consistently in when and how long they exploited resources and exposed themselves to risk. These among-individual differences in foraging behaviour were associated with consistent patterns of resource exploitation. Thus, different strategies in foraging-under-risk ultimately lead to unequal payoffs and might affect lower trophic levels in food webs. Inter-individual differences in foraging behaviour, i.e. foraging personalities, are an integral part of foraging behaviour and need to be fully integrated into optimal foraging theory. Article in Journal/Newspaper Microtus arvalis Springer Nature (via Crossref) Oecologia 194 4 621 634
institution Open Polar
collection Springer Nature (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crspringernat
language English
topic Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Eccard, Jana A.
Liesenjohann, Thilo
Dammhahn, Melanie
Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
topic_facet Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Abstract Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and resource exploitation remain unexplained. Using single foragers in artificial landscapes of perceived risks and resources with diminishing returns, we aimed to test whether foraging behaviour and resource exploitation are adjusted to risk level, vary with risk during different components of foraging, and (co)vary among individuals. We quantified foraging behaviour and resource exploitation for 21 common voles ( Microtus arvalis ). By manipulating ground cover, we created simple landscapes of two food patches varying in perceived risk during feeding in a patch and/or while travelling between patches. Foraging of individuals was variable and adjusted to risk level and type. High risk during feeding reduced feeding duration and food consumption more strongly than risk while travelling. Risk during travelling modified the risk effects of feeding for changes between patches and resulting evenness of resource exploitation. Across risk conditions individuals differed consistently in when and how long they exploited resources and exposed themselves to risk. These among-individual differences in foraging behaviour were associated with consistent patterns of resource exploitation. Thus, different strategies in foraging-under-risk ultimately lead to unequal payoffs and might affect lower trophic levels in food webs. Inter-individual differences in foraging behaviour, i.e. foraging personalities, are an integral part of foraging behaviour and need to be fully integrated into optimal foraging theory.
author2 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universität Potsdam
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Eccard, Jana A.
Liesenjohann, Thilo
Dammhahn, Melanie
author_facet Eccard, Jana A.
Liesenjohann, Thilo
Dammhahn, Melanie
author_sort Eccard, Jana A.
title Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
title_short Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
title_full Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
title_fullStr Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
title_full_unstemmed Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
title_sort among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y.pdf
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y/fulltext.html
genre Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Microtus arvalis
op_source Oecologia
volume 194, issue 4, page 621-634
ISSN 0029-8549 1432-1939
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 194
container_issue 4
container_start_page 621
op_container_end_page 634
_version_ 1766069413622054912