Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study

Background and Purpose: Knowledge of the reproducibility of a diagnostic method is important in order to evaluate its usefulness. Few studies have examined interobserver and intermethod agreement on ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis. Methods: Intersonographer agreement on ultrasound measur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cerebrovascular Diseases
Main Authors: Mathiesen, Ellisiv B., Joakimsen, Oddmund, Bønaa, Kaare H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: S. Karger AG 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000016058
https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/16058
id crskarger:10.1159/000016058
record_format openpolar
spelling crskarger:10.1159/000016058 2024-10-06T13:53:12+00:00 Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study Mathiesen, Ellisiv B. Joakimsen, Oddmund Bønaa, Kaare H. 2000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000016058 https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/16058 en eng S. Karger AG https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses Cerebrovascular Diseases volume 10, issue 3, page 207-213 ISSN 1015-9770 1421-9786 journal-article 2000 crskarger https://doi.org/10.1159/000016058 2024-09-11T04:08:02Z Background and Purpose: Knowledge of the reproducibility of a diagnostic method is important in order to evaluate its usefulness. Few studies have examined interobserver and intermethod agreement on ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis. Methods: Intersonographer agreement on ultrasound measurements of carotid plaque morphology and the estimated degree of stenosis by three ultrasound methods were assessed in a random sample of 51 participants with stenotic carotid arteries selected from a population health survey. The degree of stenosis was assessed by measurements of velocity, lumen diameter reduction and cross-sectional lumen area. Intermethod agreement on the degree of carotid stenosis was also assessed. Results: Agreement on plaque echogenicity and heterogeneity was moderate (κ = 0.56 and κ = 0.60, respectively). The mean degree of stenosis and median absolute difference between observers of the estimated degree of stenosis by the velocity method were 46.3 and 10.8%, respectively. The corresponding values were 51.0 and 5.8% for the diameter method, and 57.1 and 7.2%, for the cross-sectional lumen method. The limits of agreement for intersonographer reproducibility varied between ±19.7 and 26.5%. For all methods, reproducibility increased with increasing degree of stenosis. Differences between the methods were large in low-grade stenosis but were acceptable in high-grade stenosis. Conclusions: Considerable differences in ultrasound measurement of stenosis, which could lead to different clinical conclusions, were regularly encountered no matter what ultrasound method was used. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tromsø Karger Tromsø Cerebrovascular Diseases 10 3 207 213
institution Open Polar
collection Karger
op_collection_id crskarger
language English
description Background and Purpose: Knowledge of the reproducibility of a diagnostic method is important in order to evaluate its usefulness. Few studies have examined interobserver and intermethod agreement on ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis. Methods: Intersonographer agreement on ultrasound measurements of carotid plaque morphology and the estimated degree of stenosis by three ultrasound methods were assessed in a random sample of 51 participants with stenotic carotid arteries selected from a population health survey. The degree of stenosis was assessed by measurements of velocity, lumen diameter reduction and cross-sectional lumen area. Intermethod agreement on the degree of carotid stenosis was also assessed. Results: Agreement on plaque echogenicity and heterogeneity was moderate (κ = 0.56 and κ = 0.60, respectively). The mean degree of stenosis and median absolute difference between observers of the estimated degree of stenosis by the velocity method were 46.3 and 10.8%, respectively. The corresponding values were 51.0 and 5.8% for the diameter method, and 57.1 and 7.2%, for the cross-sectional lumen method. The limits of agreement for intersonographer reproducibility varied between ±19.7 and 26.5%. For all methods, reproducibility increased with increasing degree of stenosis. Differences between the methods were large in low-grade stenosis but were acceptable in high-grade stenosis. Conclusions: Considerable differences in ultrasound measurement of stenosis, which could lead to different clinical conclusions, were regularly encountered no matter what ultrasound method was used.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mathiesen, Ellisiv B.
Joakimsen, Oddmund
Bønaa, Kaare H.
spellingShingle Mathiesen, Ellisiv B.
Joakimsen, Oddmund
Bønaa, Kaare H.
Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study
author_facet Mathiesen, Ellisiv B.
Joakimsen, Oddmund
Bønaa, Kaare H.
author_sort Mathiesen, Ellisiv B.
title Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study
title_short Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study
title_full Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study
title_fullStr Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study
title_full_unstemmed Intersonographer Reproducibility and Intermethod Variability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Artery Stenosis: The Tromsø Study
title_sort intersonographer reproducibility and intermethod variability of ultrasound measurements of carotid artery stenosis: the tromsø study
publisher S. Karger AG
publishDate 2000
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000016058
https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/16058
geographic Tromsø
geographic_facet Tromsø
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_source Cerebrovascular Diseases
volume 10, issue 3, page 207-213
ISSN 1015-9770 1421-9786
op_rights https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses
https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1159/000016058
container_title Cerebrovascular Diseases
container_volume 10
container_issue 3
container_start_page 207
op_container_end_page 213
_version_ 1812181869715783680