Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks

In the state of Alaska, a six-span 884.5-m orthotropic steel bridge crosses the Yukon River at a 6 percent grade. The bridge is on a gravel road, it has a roadway width of 9.2 m, and the orthotropic steel deck is supported by two steel box girders 154.9 cm wide and 414.0 cm deep. The structure is ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Main Authors: Hulsey, J. Leroy, Yang, Liao, Raad, Lutfi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1654-17
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/1654-17
id crsagepubl:10.3141/1654-17
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.3141/1654-17 2024-10-13T14:11:20+00:00 Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks Hulsey, J. Leroy Yang, Liao Raad, Lutfi 1999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1654-17 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/1654-17 en eng SAGE Publications http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board volume 1654, issue 1, page 141-150 ISSN 0361-1981 2169-4052 journal-article 1999 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.3141/1654-17 2024-09-17T04:40:22Z In the state of Alaska, a six-span 884.5-m orthotropic steel bridge crosses the Yukon River at a 6 percent grade. The bridge is on a gravel road, it has a roadway width of 9.2 m, and the orthotropic steel deck is supported by two steel box girders 154.9 cm wide and 414.0 cm deep. The structure is expected to support the oil pipeline, a future gas line, and a low volume of heavy loaded trucks and to respond to harsh winter temperatures. This structure was designed in the early 1970s with a 127-mm two-layer timber deck wearing surface. Since then, the wearing surface has been replaced twice with timber decks (1981, 1992) and is again scheduled for timber deck replacement in 1999. Alternative wearing surfaces for other orthotropic bridge decks are reviewed. Orthotropic steel deck flexibility is examined and design charts for selecting the thickness for a given wearing surface are presented. The design charts account for truck loads and temperature change; no provision is made for traction or abrasion. The use of these charts is illustrated. Strains caused by prepositioned truck loads were measured in the orthotropic steel deck. The deck had a two-layer 127-mm timber wearing surface. These strains were compared by analysis. The results showed that the timber-deck system was stiff. Live load tensile strains and the range of strain were low; thermal stresses are expected to be high. Cold temperature thermal cracking, abrasion, adhesion to the steel deck, and traction are important parameters for selecting a future wearing surface. Live load fatigue in the wearing surface should not be a problem for this orthotropic bridge. Article in Journal/Newspaper Yukon river Alaska Yukon SAGE Publications Yukon Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1654 1 141 150
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
description In the state of Alaska, a six-span 884.5-m orthotropic steel bridge crosses the Yukon River at a 6 percent grade. The bridge is on a gravel road, it has a roadway width of 9.2 m, and the orthotropic steel deck is supported by two steel box girders 154.9 cm wide and 414.0 cm deep. The structure is expected to support the oil pipeline, a future gas line, and a low volume of heavy loaded trucks and to respond to harsh winter temperatures. This structure was designed in the early 1970s with a 127-mm two-layer timber deck wearing surface. Since then, the wearing surface has been replaced twice with timber decks (1981, 1992) and is again scheduled for timber deck replacement in 1999. Alternative wearing surfaces for other orthotropic bridge decks are reviewed. Orthotropic steel deck flexibility is examined and design charts for selecting the thickness for a given wearing surface are presented. The design charts account for truck loads and temperature change; no provision is made for traction or abrasion. The use of these charts is illustrated. Strains caused by prepositioned truck loads were measured in the orthotropic steel deck. The deck had a two-layer 127-mm timber wearing surface. These strains were compared by analysis. The results showed that the timber-deck system was stiff. Live load tensile strains and the range of strain were low; thermal stresses are expected to be high. Cold temperature thermal cracking, abrasion, adhesion to the steel deck, and traction are important parameters for selecting a future wearing surface. Live load fatigue in the wearing surface should not be a problem for this orthotropic bridge.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hulsey, J. Leroy
Yang, Liao
Raad, Lutfi
spellingShingle Hulsey, J. Leroy
Yang, Liao
Raad, Lutfi
Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
author_facet Hulsey, J. Leroy
Yang, Liao
Raad, Lutfi
author_sort Hulsey, J. Leroy
title Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
title_short Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
title_full Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
title_fullStr Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
title_full_unstemmed Wearing Surfaces for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks
title_sort wearing surfaces for orthotropic steel bridge decks
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 1999
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1654-17
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/1654-17
geographic Yukon
geographic_facet Yukon
genre Yukon river
Alaska
Yukon
genre_facet Yukon river
Alaska
Yukon
op_source Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
volume 1654, issue 1, page 141-150
ISSN 0361-1981 2169-4052
op_rights http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3141/1654-17
container_title Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
container_volume 1654
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
op_container_end_page 150
_version_ 1812819032696422400