Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007

Critical commentary about the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) has included the claim that the media presented a simplistic and stereotyped image of Aboriginal communities at the time of its introduction in 2007, but to date there has been no systematic analysis to support this. This stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Sociology
Main Authors: Proudfoot, Fiona, Habibis, Daphne
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1440783313482368
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/1440783313482368
id crsagepubl:10.1177/1440783313482368
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.1177/1440783313482368 2024-10-06T13:48:44+00:00 Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007 Proudfoot, Fiona Habibis, Daphne 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1440783313482368 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/1440783313482368 en eng SAGE Publications https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Journal of Sociology volume 51, issue 2, page 170-188 ISSN 1440-7833 1741-2978 journal-article 2013 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368 2024-09-10T04:27:00Z Critical commentary about the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) has included the claim that the media presented a simplistic and stereotyped image of Aboriginal communities at the time of its introduction in 2007, but to date there has been no systematic analysis to support this. This study addresses this research gap through a critical discourse analysis of reportage of the NTER in mainstream and Aboriginal populist print media. The findings reveal major differences in these accounts, with radically different propositions and normative assumptions. Mainstream media were overwhelmingly negative in their portrayal of remote Aboriginal communities, were silent about Aboriginal resistance and portrayed urgent Commonwealth intervention as necessary and heroic. The Aboriginal media provided contextualised accounts of the issues and focused intensely on the human rights implications of the intervention. The findings reveal a concerning racialised divide in representations of the issues facing remote Aboriginal communities in 2007 that helps to explain why the Australian public accepted policies that discriminated against Australia’s First Nations peoples. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations SAGE Publications Journal of Sociology 51 2 170 188
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
description Critical commentary about the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) has included the claim that the media presented a simplistic and stereotyped image of Aboriginal communities at the time of its introduction in 2007, but to date there has been no systematic analysis to support this. This study addresses this research gap through a critical discourse analysis of reportage of the NTER in mainstream and Aboriginal populist print media. The findings reveal major differences in these accounts, with radically different propositions and normative assumptions. Mainstream media were overwhelmingly negative in their portrayal of remote Aboriginal communities, were silent about Aboriginal resistance and portrayed urgent Commonwealth intervention as necessary and heroic. The Aboriginal media provided contextualised accounts of the issues and focused intensely on the human rights implications of the intervention. The findings reveal a concerning racialised divide in representations of the issues facing remote Aboriginal communities in 2007 that helps to explain why the Australian public accepted policies that discriminated against Australia’s First Nations peoples.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Proudfoot, Fiona
Habibis, Daphne
spellingShingle Proudfoot, Fiona
Habibis, Daphne
Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007
author_facet Proudfoot, Fiona
Habibis, Daphne
author_sort Proudfoot, Fiona
title Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007
title_short Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007
title_full Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007
title_fullStr Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007
title_full_unstemmed Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007
title_sort separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and aboriginal populist media accounts of the northern territory emergency response in 2007
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1440783313482368
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/1440783313482368
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Journal of Sociology
volume 51, issue 2, page 170-188
ISSN 1440-7833 1741-2978
op_rights https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
container_title Journal of Sociology
container_volume 51
container_issue 2
container_start_page 170
op_container_end_page 188
_version_ 1812176816709828608