Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping
Teetl’it Gwich’ins, NWT, Canada have consistently positioned trapping as a valuable exercise despite fluctuations in the price of furs. Materialist anthropological theories applied to the trapping economies of boreal forest First Nations created an image of trapping as an activity that necessarily l...
Published in: | Journal of Material Culture |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820365 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1359183518820365 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/1359183518820365 |
id |
crsagepubl:10.1177/1359183518820365 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crsagepubl:10.1177/1359183518820365 2023-05-15T16:17:00+02:00 Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping Wishart, Robert P 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820365 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1359183518820365 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/1359183518820365 en eng SAGE Publications http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Journal of Material Culture volume 24, issue 4, page 437-452 ISSN 1359-1835 1460-3586 Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Archeology Anthropology journal-article 2018 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820365 2022-04-14T04:34:15Z Teetl’it Gwich’ins, NWT, Canada have consistently positioned trapping as a valuable exercise despite fluctuations in the price of furs. Materialist anthropological theories applied to the trapping economies of boreal forest First Nations created an image of trapping as an activity that necessarily leads to individualism, alienation, nucleated family structures and disenchantment because the furs were being produced for trade in the world economy. The rise of anti-fur sentiments and Canadian industrial intrusions helped cement this imaginary of the trapper as corrupt but, instead of simply being the victims of European domination, they were positioned to have abandoned the ‘traditional’ sensibilities of trust and reciprocity to adopt the cruelties of the steel trap. In contrast with these conjectural world histories, the author argues that trapping as it is practiced today is far from being an alienating practice. Indigenous trappers work with animals in ways that suit their pre-existing practices. In order to dispel the imaginary of the cruel dominator of animals, more recent thoughts on mutualism in human–animal relationships help but it would be difficult to argue that this activity does not require some deception. Indigenous trappers will create methods and tinker with their traps in ways that are counterintuitive to some of the human–environment dualisms found in the deception paradigm that posits that the human presence and the intention to trap is hidden from the animal and tricks it into making a fatal error. The author argues that trapping is effective and valued because it plays upon the signs and expectations which lie between the past and the present, and between domination and mutualism. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Gwich’in SAGE Publications (via Crossref) Canada Journal of Material Culture 24 4 437 452 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
SAGE Publications (via Crossref) |
op_collection_id |
crsagepubl |
language |
English |
topic |
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Archeology Anthropology |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Archeology Anthropology Wishart, Robert P Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
topic_facet |
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Archeology Anthropology |
description |
Teetl’it Gwich’ins, NWT, Canada have consistently positioned trapping as a valuable exercise despite fluctuations in the price of furs. Materialist anthropological theories applied to the trapping economies of boreal forest First Nations created an image of trapping as an activity that necessarily leads to individualism, alienation, nucleated family structures and disenchantment because the furs were being produced for trade in the world economy. The rise of anti-fur sentiments and Canadian industrial intrusions helped cement this imaginary of the trapper as corrupt but, instead of simply being the victims of European domination, they were positioned to have abandoned the ‘traditional’ sensibilities of trust and reciprocity to adopt the cruelties of the steel trap. In contrast with these conjectural world histories, the author argues that trapping as it is practiced today is far from being an alienating practice. Indigenous trappers work with animals in ways that suit their pre-existing practices. In order to dispel the imaginary of the cruel dominator of animals, more recent thoughts on mutualism in human–animal relationships help but it would be difficult to argue that this activity does not require some deception. Indigenous trappers will create methods and tinker with their traps in ways that are counterintuitive to some of the human–environment dualisms found in the deception paradigm that posits that the human presence and the intention to trap is hidden from the animal and tricks it into making a fatal error. The author argues that trapping is effective and valued because it plays upon the signs and expectations which lie between the past and the present, and between domination and mutualism. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Wishart, Robert P |
author_facet |
Wishart, Robert P |
author_sort |
Wishart, Robert P |
title |
Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
title_short |
Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
title_full |
Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
title_fullStr |
Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Where is the real trap? Domination and mutualism in Teetl’it Gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
title_sort |
where is the real trap? domination and mutualism in teetl’it gwich’in sensibilities about trapping |
publisher |
SAGE Publications |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820365 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1359183518820365 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/1359183518820365 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
First Nations Gwich’in |
genre_facet |
First Nations Gwich’in |
op_source |
Journal of Material Culture volume 24, issue 4, page 437-452 ISSN 1359-1835 1460-3586 |
op_rights |
http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820365 |
container_title |
Journal of Material Culture |
container_volume |
24 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
437 |
op_container_end_page |
452 |
_version_ |
1766002848782352384 |