Toward a Greater Eurasia

The map of the big Eurasian supercontinent is currently being shaped by three separate regional initiatives, the European Union (EU), a Eurasian Union proposed by Russia, and the plethora of fast-developing Asian groupings. In addition, Europe and Asia are flanked by two intercontinental development...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies
Main Author: Emerson, Michael
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0974910113511193
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0974910113511193
id crsagepubl:10.1177/0974910113511193
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.1177/0974910113511193 2024-09-30T14:31:27+00:00 Toward a Greater Eurasia Who, Why, What, and How? Emerson, Michael 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0974910113511193 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0974910113511193 en eng SAGE Publications https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies volume 6, issue 1, page 35-68 ISSN 0974-9101 0975-2730 journal-article 2014 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910113511193 2024-09-17T04:39:13Z The map of the big Eurasian supercontinent is currently being shaped by three separate regional initiatives, the European Union (EU), a Eurasian Union proposed by Russia, and the plethora of fast-developing Asian groupings. In addition, Europe and Asia are flanked by two intercontinental developments across both Euro-Atlantic and Asian-Pacific areas, which effectively cut the Eurasian supercontinent in half. By contrast, the present article examines the case for a Greater Eurasia, which would embrace all of Europe and Asia. Eurasianism on a smaller scale already has several variants with long historical roots in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Turkey, but these are addressing Lesser rather than Greater Eurasias. Concretely, there is already an important agenda of issues of concern for the whole of the Greater Eurasia: security around post-2014 Afghanistan; transcontinental transport connections; energy supplies and transit to both west and east; rationalization of the proliferating free trade areas; and Arctic cooperation, to name just a few. But there are also overarching long-term issues of political, economic, societal, and even philosophical nature facing this Greater Eurasia. The question is whether these immediate and longer-term issues need to be treated holistically with a growing sense of common Greater Eurasian identity, with a deepening institutional network of overlapping but differentiated bodies and arrangements. This Greater Eurasia is going to account for much of the advanced world far into the twenty-first century. It should, therefore, rise in significance as a strategic space alongside the current set of regional, intercontinental, and global groupings. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic SAGE Publications Arctic Pacific Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 6 1 35 68
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
description The map of the big Eurasian supercontinent is currently being shaped by three separate regional initiatives, the European Union (EU), a Eurasian Union proposed by Russia, and the plethora of fast-developing Asian groupings. In addition, Europe and Asia are flanked by two intercontinental developments across both Euro-Atlantic and Asian-Pacific areas, which effectively cut the Eurasian supercontinent in half. By contrast, the present article examines the case for a Greater Eurasia, which would embrace all of Europe and Asia. Eurasianism on a smaller scale already has several variants with long historical roots in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Turkey, but these are addressing Lesser rather than Greater Eurasias. Concretely, there is already an important agenda of issues of concern for the whole of the Greater Eurasia: security around post-2014 Afghanistan; transcontinental transport connections; energy supplies and transit to both west and east; rationalization of the proliferating free trade areas; and Arctic cooperation, to name just a few. But there are also overarching long-term issues of political, economic, societal, and even philosophical nature facing this Greater Eurasia. The question is whether these immediate and longer-term issues need to be treated holistically with a growing sense of common Greater Eurasian identity, with a deepening institutional network of overlapping but differentiated bodies and arrangements. This Greater Eurasia is going to account for much of the advanced world far into the twenty-first century. It should, therefore, rise in significance as a strategic space alongside the current set of regional, intercontinental, and global groupings.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Emerson, Michael
spellingShingle Emerson, Michael
Toward a Greater Eurasia
author_facet Emerson, Michael
author_sort Emerson, Michael
title Toward a Greater Eurasia
title_short Toward a Greater Eurasia
title_full Toward a Greater Eurasia
title_fullStr Toward a Greater Eurasia
title_full_unstemmed Toward a Greater Eurasia
title_sort toward a greater eurasia
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0974910113511193
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0974910113511193
geographic Arctic
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Pacific
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies
volume 6, issue 1, page 35-68
ISSN 0974-9101 0975-2730
op_rights https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910113511193
container_title Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies
container_volume 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
op_container_end_page 68
_version_ 1811635997938548736