Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia

In ongoing discussions surrounding the issue of human security, the security of individuals has become entangled in conceptual debates that are preoccupied with notions of appropriate variables, measurements and issue areas. This article suggests and illustrates a basis for human security research t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Security Dialogue
Main Author: Stuvøy, Kirsti
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010610370226
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0967010610370226
id crsagepubl:10.1177/0967010610370226
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.1177/0967010610370226 2023-05-15T17:46:03+02:00 Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia Stuvøy, Kirsti 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010610370226 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0967010610370226 en eng SAGE Publications http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Security Dialogue volume 41, issue 3, page 279-299 ISSN 0967-0106 1460-3640 Political Science and International Relations Sociology and Political Science journal-article 2010 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610370226 2022-04-14T04:49:55Z In ongoing discussions surrounding the issue of human security, the security of individuals has become entangled in conceptual debates that are preoccupied with notions of appropriate variables, measurements and issue areas. This article suggests and illustrates a basis for human security research that is distinct from such objectivist empiricism. A case study of crisis centres in northwest Russia is used to demonstrate that human security is not only a matter for objectified generalizations, but also a question of practices. Feminist security theory and the work of Pierre Bourdieu are used to address methodological concerns raised during fieldwork on crisis centres in northwest Russia. Three dimensions are discussed: the conceptualization of security for the specific-actor approach of crisis centres, the ways in which relevant empirical data are established, and the subsequent interpretation of such data. The discussion shows, first, that rethinking security for crisis centres reveals contingencies in the research process that are relevant to the establishment of human security knowledge; second, the practice of human security research reflects the fragility in the understanding and production of security in everyday contexts. Accordingly, when we examine human security, our analysis ought to be directed at security as an ambiguous practice. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northwest Russia SAGE Publications (via Crossref) Security Dialogue 41 3 279 299
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
topic Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
spellingShingle Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
Stuvøy, Kirsti
Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia
topic_facet Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
description In ongoing discussions surrounding the issue of human security, the security of individuals has become entangled in conceptual debates that are preoccupied with notions of appropriate variables, measurements and issue areas. This article suggests and illustrates a basis for human security research that is distinct from such objectivist empiricism. A case study of crisis centres in northwest Russia is used to demonstrate that human security is not only a matter for objectified generalizations, but also a question of practices. Feminist security theory and the work of Pierre Bourdieu are used to address methodological concerns raised during fieldwork on crisis centres in northwest Russia. Three dimensions are discussed: the conceptualization of security for the specific-actor approach of crisis centres, the ways in which relevant empirical data are established, and the subsequent interpretation of such data. The discussion shows, first, that rethinking security for crisis centres reveals contingencies in the research process that are relevant to the establishment of human security knowledge; second, the practice of human security research reflects the fragility in the understanding and production of security in everyday contexts. Accordingly, when we examine human security, our analysis ought to be directed at security as an ambiguous practice.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stuvøy, Kirsti
author_facet Stuvøy, Kirsti
author_sort Stuvøy, Kirsti
title Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia
title_short Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia
title_full Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia
title_fullStr Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia
title_full_unstemmed Human Security Research Practices: Conceptualizing Security for Women’s Crisis Centres in Russia
title_sort human security research practices: conceptualizing security for women’s crisis centres in russia
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010610370226
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0967010610370226
genre Northwest Russia
genre_facet Northwest Russia
op_source Security Dialogue
volume 41, issue 3, page 279-299
ISSN 0967-0106 1460-3640
op_rights http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610370226
container_title Security Dialogue
container_volume 41
container_issue 3
container_start_page 279
op_container_end_page 299
_version_ 1766149402363166720