The “good” epidural: Women’s use of epidurals in relation to dominant discourses on “natural” birth

• Published in: Feminism & Psychology
• Main Authors: Símonardóttir, Sunna, Rúdólfsdóttir, Annadís Greta
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publications 2020
• Subjects: Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353520944808; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0959353520944808; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0959353520944808

Childbirth is widely recognized to be among the most painful of experiences, and the most common and effective pain relief for birthing women is known to be the use of epidural analgesia. The increase in the use of epidural analgesia for birthing women has been described by some critics as a by-product of the medicalized model of birth, although there remains a notable dearth of research regarding women’s experiences of epidurals. The present paper seeks to address this research gap by examining how first-time mothers in Iceland discuss their intentions concerning pain relief during birth, along with how they construct childbirth-related pain and the use of epidural analgesia in the context of a midwife-led model of care and an institutionalized preference for “natural” birth. The findings demonstrate that, despite initial intentions, most of the women end up having an epidural, and most describe their epidurals as both wonderful and immensely helpful. The dominant narrative about “natural” childbirth being preferable is not fully refuted by this. Instead, the women either align themselves with the ideology of the capable and knowing body or resist and contest this narrative by constructing their birthing bodies as open to, and in need of, assistance.