Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective

This article offers a comparative analysis of Ukraine’s Association Agreement against the backdrop of other agreements of the EU with third countries that facilitate their partial integration into the EU’s common space of four freedoms, albeit without institutional membership (EEA Agreement of Norwa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
Main Author: Duleba, Alexander
Other Authors: Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08883254211005179
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08883254211005179
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/08883254211005179
id crsagepubl:10.1177/08883254211005179
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.1177/08883254211005179 2024-09-15T18:14:07+00:00 Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective Duleba, Alexander Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08883254211005179 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08883254211005179 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/08883254211005179 en eng SAGE Publications http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures volume 36, issue 2, page 359-377 ISSN 0888-3254 1533-8371 journal-article 2021 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254211005179 2024-07-29T04:26:03Z This article offers a comparative analysis of Ukraine’s Association Agreement against the backdrop of other agreements of the EU with third countries that facilitate their partial integration into the EU’s common space of four freedoms, albeit without institutional membership (EEA Agreement of Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein; EU–Swiss Bilaterals, and Turkey’s Customs Union). In addition, this analysis includes the Stabilisation and Association Agreements of the Western Balkan countries and the former Europe Agreements of the Central European countries. The research draws on concepts of differentiated integration and external governance of the EU. The analysis is built along two dimensions: identification of the regulatory boundary (policy-taking: scope of transposition of the EU acquis, legal quality of transposition, and the type of supervision mechanism) and organizational boundary (policy-shaping: inclusion in the EU institutions). The analysis concludes that Ukraine’s Association Agreement compared with other EU integration agreements with third countries includes the largest structural asymmetry, that is, a biggest gap between the largest volume of acquis, which Ukraine has to incorporate into its national legislation on one hand, and the lowest level of institutional involvement of Ukraine in policy-shaping within the EU on the other. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland SAGE Publications East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 088832542110051
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
description This article offers a comparative analysis of Ukraine’s Association Agreement against the backdrop of other agreements of the EU with third countries that facilitate their partial integration into the EU’s common space of four freedoms, albeit without institutional membership (EEA Agreement of Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein; EU–Swiss Bilaterals, and Turkey’s Customs Union). In addition, this analysis includes the Stabilisation and Association Agreements of the Western Balkan countries and the former Europe Agreements of the Central European countries. The research draws on concepts of differentiated integration and external governance of the EU. The analysis is built along two dimensions: identification of the regulatory boundary (policy-taking: scope of transposition of the EU acquis, legal quality of transposition, and the type of supervision mechanism) and organizational boundary (policy-shaping: inclusion in the EU institutions). The analysis concludes that Ukraine’s Association Agreement compared with other EU integration agreements with third countries includes the largest structural asymmetry, that is, a biggest gap between the largest volume of acquis, which Ukraine has to incorporate into its national legislation on one hand, and the lowest level of institutional involvement of Ukraine in policy-shaping within the EU on the other.
author2 Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Duleba, Alexander
spellingShingle Duleba, Alexander
Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective
author_facet Duleba, Alexander
author_sort Duleba, Alexander
title Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective
title_short Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective
title_full Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective
title_fullStr Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Differentiated European Integration of Ukraine in Comparative Perspective
title_sort differentiated european integration of ukraine in comparative perspective
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08883254211005179
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08883254211005179
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/08883254211005179
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
volume 36, issue 2, page 359-377
ISSN 0888-3254 1533-8371
op_rights http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254211005179
container_title East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
container_start_page 088832542110051
_version_ 1810451896870109184