Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids

This paper examines the role of environmental risk in the Interior Department's Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) acreage offering decision process and the oil industry's bidding decision. Following a brief discussion of the OCS leasing process, a conceptual model for understanding the decisio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Main Authors: Englin, J. E., Klan, M. S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014459878800600411
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014459878800600411
id crsagepubl:10.1177/014459878800600411
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.1177/014459878800600411 2023-05-15T17:33:34+02:00 Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids Englin, J. E. Klan, M. S. 1988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014459878800600411 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014459878800600411 en eng SAGE Publications http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Energy Exploration & Exploitation volume 6, issue 4-5, page 378-391 ISSN 0144-5987 2048-4054 Energy Engineering and Power Technology Fuel Technology Nuclear Energy and Engineering Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment journal-article 1988 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/014459878800600411 2022-04-14T04:49:30Z This paper examines the role of environmental risk in the Interior Department's Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) acreage offering decision process and the oil industry's bidding decision. Following a brief discussion of the OCS leasing process, a conceptual model for understanding the decisions proposed. The associated equations are econometrically estimated for both Interior und the oil industry using data from the 1979 North Atlantic Georges Bank Sale. By estimating decision equations as a function of environmental risk, cost of extraction, and expected hydrocarbon potential, the trade off between these parameters is revealed. Two important results are obtained. First is that in the Norht Atlantic study case, the acreage of interest to industry was largely a subset of the acreage Interior was willing to offer. This implies that industry was generally more conservative with respect to environmental risk than Interior. Second, the industry trade off between expected hydrocarbons and risk of a potential oil spill reaching shore was considerable. Over $1 million worth of additional expected hydrocarbons was needed to induce a bid if the risk of a spill hitting shore increased about 7% Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic SAGE Publications (via Crossref) Energy Exploration & Exploitation 6 4-5 378 391
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
topic Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
spellingShingle Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Englin, J. E.
Klan, M. S.
Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids
topic_facet Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
description This paper examines the role of environmental risk in the Interior Department's Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) acreage offering decision process and the oil industry's bidding decision. Following a brief discussion of the OCS leasing process, a conceptual model for understanding the decisions proposed. The associated equations are econometrically estimated for both Interior und the oil industry using data from the 1979 North Atlantic Georges Bank Sale. By estimating decision equations as a function of environmental risk, cost of extraction, and expected hydrocarbon potential, the trade off between these parameters is revealed. Two important results are obtained. First is that in the Norht Atlantic study case, the acreage of interest to industry was largely a subset of the acreage Interior was willing to offer. This implies that industry was generally more conservative with respect to environmental risk than Interior. Second, the industry trade off between expected hydrocarbons and risk of a potential oil spill reaching shore was considerable. Over $1 million worth of additional expected hydrocarbons was needed to induce a bid if the risk of a spill hitting shore increased about 7%
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Englin, J. E.
Klan, M. S.
author_facet Englin, J. E.
Klan, M. S.
author_sort Englin, J. E.
title Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids
title_short Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids
title_full Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids
title_fullStr Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids
title_full_unstemmed Offshore Oil and Environmental Risk: Federal Offerings vs. Industry Bids
title_sort offshore oil and environmental risk: federal offerings vs. industry bids
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 1988
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014459878800600411
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014459878800600411
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Energy Exploration & Exploitation
volume 6, issue 4-5, page 378-391
ISSN 0144-5987 2048-4054
op_rights http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/014459878800600411
container_title Energy Exploration & Exploitation
container_volume 6
container_issue 4-5
container_start_page 378
op_container_end_page 391
_version_ 1766132114708758528