International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale

Previous research illustrated that the laws regulating involuntary placement and treatment of people with mental-health problems are diverse across countries. International studies comparing satisfaction levels between countries are rare. We compared the opinions of professionals and family members...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine, Science and the Law
Main Authors: Georgieva, Irina, Whittington, Richard, Lauvrud, Christian, Steinert, Tilman, Wikman, Sofia, Lepping, Peter, Duxbury, Joy, Snorrason, Jon, Mihai, Adriana, Berring, Lene Lauge, BN, Raveesh, Vesselinov, Roumen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0025802419841139
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0025802419841139
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0025802419841139
id crsagepubl:10.1177/0025802419841139
record_format openpolar
spelling crsagepubl:10.1177/0025802419841139 2024-06-23T07:54:04+00:00 International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale Georgieva, Irina Whittington, Richard Lauvrud, Christian Steinert, Tilman Wikman, Sofia Lepping, Peter Duxbury, Joy Snorrason, Jon Mihai, Adriana Berring, Lene Lauge BN, Raveesh Vesselinov, Roumen 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0025802419841139 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0025802419841139 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0025802419841139 en eng SAGE Publications http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license Medicine, Science and the Law volume 59, issue 2, page 104-114 ISSN 0025-8024 2042-1818 journal-article 2019 crsagepubl https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419841139 2024-06-04T06:27:42Z Previous research illustrated that the laws regulating involuntary placement and treatment of people with mental-health problems are diverse across countries. International studies comparing satisfaction levels between countries are rare. We compared the opinions of professionals and family members about the operation of the national mental-health law regulating forcibly admission and treatment of psychiatric patients in 11 countries: Ireland, Iceland, England and Wales, Romania, Slovenia, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Norway and India. An online survey design was adopted using a Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale (MHLAS). This brief nine-item questionnaire was distributed via email to psychiatrists, general practitioners, acute and community mental-health nurses, tribunal members, police officers and family members in each collaborating country. The levels of agreement/disagreement were measured on a Likert scale. Data were analysed both per question and with regard to a total MHLAS ‘approval’ score computed as a sum of the nine questions. We found that respondents in England and Wales and Denmark expressed the highest approval for their national legislation (76% and 74%, respectively), with those in India and Ireland expressing the lowest approval (65% and 64%, respectively). Almost all countries had a more positive attitude in comparison to Ireland on the admission criteria for involuntary placement and the way people are transferred to psychiatric hospitals. There are significant variations across Europe and beyond in terms of approval for how the national mental-health law framework operates in each country. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland SAGE Publications Norway Medicine, Science and the Law 59 2 104 114
institution Open Polar
collection SAGE Publications
op_collection_id crsagepubl
language English
description Previous research illustrated that the laws regulating involuntary placement and treatment of people with mental-health problems are diverse across countries. International studies comparing satisfaction levels between countries are rare. We compared the opinions of professionals and family members about the operation of the national mental-health law regulating forcibly admission and treatment of psychiatric patients in 11 countries: Ireland, Iceland, England and Wales, Romania, Slovenia, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Norway and India. An online survey design was adopted using a Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale (MHLAS). This brief nine-item questionnaire was distributed via email to psychiatrists, general practitioners, acute and community mental-health nurses, tribunal members, police officers and family members in each collaborating country. The levels of agreement/disagreement were measured on a Likert scale. Data were analysed both per question and with regard to a total MHLAS ‘approval’ score computed as a sum of the nine questions. We found that respondents in England and Wales and Denmark expressed the highest approval for their national legislation (76% and 74%, respectively), with those in India and Ireland expressing the lowest approval (65% and 64%, respectively). Almost all countries had a more positive attitude in comparison to Ireland on the admission criteria for involuntary placement and the way people are transferred to psychiatric hospitals. There are significant variations across Europe and beyond in terms of approval for how the national mental-health law framework operates in each country.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Georgieva, Irina
Whittington, Richard
Lauvrud, Christian
Steinert, Tilman
Wikman, Sofia
Lepping, Peter
Duxbury, Joy
Snorrason, Jon
Mihai, Adriana
Berring, Lene Lauge
BN, Raveesh
Vesselinov, Roumen
spellingShingle Georgieva, Irina
Whittington, Richard
Lauvrud, Christian
Steinert, Tilman
Wikman, Sofia
Lepping, Peter
Duxbury, Joy
Snorrason, Jon
Mihai, Adriana
Berring, Lene Lauge
BN, Raveesh
Vesselinov, Roumen
International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale
author_facet Georgieva, Irina
Whittington, Richard
Lauvrud, Christian
Steinert, Tilman
Wikman, Sofia
Lepping, Peter
Duxbury, Joy
Snorrason, Jon
Mihai, Adriana
Berring, Lene Lauge
BN, Raveesh
Vesselinov, Roumen
author_sort Georgieva, Irina
title International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale
title_short International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale
title_full International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale
title_fullStr International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale
title_full_unstemmed International variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale
title_sort international variations in mental-health law regulating involuntary commitment of psychiatric patients as measured by the mental health legislation attitudes scale
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0025802419841139
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0025802419841139
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0025802419841139
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Medicine, Science and the Law
volume 59, issue 2, page 104-114
ISSN 0025-8024 2042-1818
op_rights http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419841139
container_title Medicine, Science and the Law
container_volume 59
container_issue 2
container_start_page 104
op_container_end_page 114
_version_ 1802646016495714304