Why is There so Much Controversy Regarding the Population Health Impact of the Great Recession? Reflections on Three Case Studies

• Published in: International Journal of Health Services
• Main Authors: Bacigalupe, Amaia, Shahidi, Faraz Vahid, Muntaner, Carles, Martín, Unai, Borrell, Carme
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publications 2015
• Subjects: Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020731415611634; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0020731415611634; http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0020731415611634

In the aftermath of the Great Recession, public health scholars have grown increasingly interested in studying the health consequences of macroeconomic change. Reflecting existing debates on the nature of this relationship, research on the effects of the recent economic crisis has sparked considerable controversy. On the one hand there is evidence to support the notion that macroeconomic downturns are associated with positive health outcomes. On the other hand, a growing number of studies warn that the current economic crisis can be expected to pose serious problems for the public’s health. This article contributes to this debate through a review of recent evidence from three case studies: Iceland, Spain, and Greece. It shows that the economic crisis has negatively impacted some population health indicators (e.g., mental health) in all three countries, but especially in Greece. Available evidence defies deterministic conclusions, including increasingly “conventional” claims about economic downturns improving life expectancy and reducing mortality. While our results echo previous research in finding that the relationship between economic crises and population health is complex, they also indicate that this complexity is not arbitrary. On the contrary, changing social and political contexts provide meaningful, if partial, explanations for the perplexing nature of recent empirical findings.