When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future

Climate change projections necessarily involve uncertainty. Analysis of the physics and mathematics of the climate system reveals that greater uncertainty about future temperature increases is nearly always associated with greater expected damages from climate change. In contrast to those normative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Main Authors: Ballard, Timothy, Lewandowsky, Stephan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
id crroyalsociety:10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
record_format openpolar
spelling crroyalsociety:10.1098/rsta.2014.0464 2024-09-15T18:02:12+00:00 When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future Ballard, Timothy Lewandowsky, Stephan 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464 en eng The Royal Society https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences volume 373, issue 2055, page 20140464 ISSN 1364-503X 1471-2962 journal-article 2015 crroyalsociety https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464 2024-07-01T04:20:46Z Climate change projections necessarily involve uncertainty. Analysis of the physics and mathematics of the climate system reveals that greater uncertainty about future temperature increases is nearly always associated with greater expected damages from climate change. In contrast to those normative constraints, uncertainty is frequently cited in public discourse as a reason to delay mitigative action. This failure to understand the actual implications of uncertainty may incur notable future costs. It is therefore important to communicate uncertainty in a way that improves people’s understanding of climate change risks. We examined whether responses to projections were influenced by whether the projection emphasized uncertainty in the outcome or in its time of arrival. We presented participants with statements and graphs indicating projected increases in temperature, sea levels, ocean acidification and a decrease in arctic sea ice. In the uncertain-outcome condition, statements reported the upper and lower confidence bounds of the projected outcome at a fixed time point. In the uncertain time-of-arrival condition, statements reported the upper and lower confidence bounds of the projected time of arrival for a fixed outcome. Results suggested that people perceived the threat as more serious and were more likely to encourage mitigative action in the time-uncertain condition than in the outcome-uncertain condition. This finding has implications for effectively communicating the climate change risks to policy-makers and the general public. Article in Journal/Newspaper Climate change Ocean acidification Sea ice The Royal Society Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 373 2055 20140464
institution Open Polar
collection The Royal Society
op_collection_id crroyalsociety
language English
description Climate change projections necessarily involve uncertainty. Analysis of the physics and mathematics of the climate system reveals that greater uncertainty about future temperature increases is nearly always associated with greater expected damages from climate change. In contrast to those normative constraints, uncertainty is frequently cited in public discourse as a reason to delay mitigative action. This failure to understand the actual implications of uncertainty may incur notable future costs. It is therefore important to communicate uncertainty in a way that improves people’s understanding of climate change risks. We examined whether responses to projections were influenced by whether the projection emphasized uncertainty in the outcome or in its time of arrival. We presented participants with statements and graphs indicating projected increases in temperature, sea levels, ocean acidification and a decrease in arctic sea ice. In the uncertain-outcome condition, statements reported the upper and lower confidence bounds of the projected outcome at a fixed time point. In the uncertain time-of-arrival condition, statements reported the upper and lower confidence bounds of the projected time of arrival for a fixed outcome. Results suggested that people perceived the threat as more serious and were more likely to encourage mitigative action in the time-uncertain condition than in the outcome-uncertain condition. This finding has implications for effectively communicating the climate change risks to policy-makers and the general public.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ballard, Timothy
Lewandowsky, Stephan
spellingShingle Ballard, Timothy
Lewandowsky, Stephan
When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
author_facet Ballard, Timothy
Lewandowsky, Stephan
author_sort Ballard, Timothy
title When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
title_short When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
title_full When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
title_fullStr When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
title_full_unstemmed When, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
title_sort when, not if: the inescapability of an uncertain climate future
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
genre Climate change
Ocean acidification
Sea ice
genre_facet Climate change
Ocean acidification
Sea ice
op_source Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
volume 373, issue 2055, page 20140464
ISSN 1364-503X 1471-2962
op_rights https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0464
container_title Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
container_volume 373
container_issue 2055
container_start_page 20140464
_version_ 1810439607383228416