Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens

Historic museum specimens are increasingly used to answer a wide variety of questions in scientific research. Nevertheless, the scientific value of these specimens depends on the authenticity of the data associated with them. Here we use individual-based genetic analyses to demonstrate erroneous loc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Main Authors: Boessenkool, Sanne, Star, Bastiaan, Scofield, R. Paul, Seddon, Philip J., Waters, Jonathan M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
id crroyalsociety:10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
record_format openpolar
spelling crroyalsociety:10.1098/rspb.2009.1837 2024-09-30T14:23:35+00:00 Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens Boessenkool, Sanne Star, Bastiaan Scofield, R. Paul Seddon, Philip J. Waters, Jonathan M. 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837 en eng The Royal Society https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences volume 277, issue 1684, page 1057-1064 ISSN 0962-8452 1471-2954 journal-article 2009 crroyalsociety https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837 2024-09-02T04:21:07Z Historic museum specimens are increasingly used to answer a wide variety of questions in scientific research. Nevertheless, the scientific value of these specimens depends on the authenticity of the data associated with them. Here we use individual-based genetic analyses to demonstrate erroneous locality information for archive specimens from the late nineteenth century. Specifically, using 10 microsatellite markers, we analysed 350 contemporary and 43 historic yellow-eyed penguin ( Megadyptes antipodes ) specimens from New Zealand's South Island and sub-Antarctic regions. Factorial correspondence analysis and an assignment test strongly suggest that eight of the historic specimens purportedly of sub-Antarctic origin were in fact collected from the South Island. Interestingly, all eight specimens were obtained by the same collector, and all are currently held in the same museum collection. Further inspection of the specimen labels and evaluation of sub-Antarctic voyages did not reveal whether the erroneous data are caused by incorrect labelling or whether deliberate falsification was at play. This study highlights a promising extension to the well-known applications of assignment tests in molecular ecology, which can complement methods that are currently being applied for error detection in specimen data. Our results also serve as a warning to all who use archive specimens to invest time in the verification of collection information. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic The Royal Society Antarctic Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277 1684 1057 1064
institution Open Polar
collection The Royal Society
op_collection_id crroyalsociety
language English
description Historic museum specimens are increasingly used to answer a wide variety of questions in scientific research. Nevertheless, the scientific value of these specimens depends on the authenticity of the data associated with them. Here we use individual-based genetic analyses to demonstrate erroneous locality information for archive specimens from the late nineteenth century. Specifically, using 10 microsatellite markers, we analysed 350 contemporary and 43 historic yellow-eyed penguin ( Megadyptes antipodes ) specimens from New Zealand's South Island and sub-Antarctic regions. Factorial correspondence analysis and an assignment test strongly suggest that eight of the historic specimens purportedly of sub-Antarctic origin were in fact collected from the South Island. Interestingly, all eight specimens were obtained by the same collector, and all are currently held in the same museum collection. Further inspection of the specimen labels and evaluation of sub-Antarctic voyages did not reveal whether the erroneous data are caused by incorrect labelling or whether deliberate falsification was at play. This study highlights a promising extension to the well-known applications of assignment tests in molecular ecology, which can complement methods that are currently being applied for error detection in specimen data. Our results also serve as a warning to all who use archive specimens to invest time in the verification of collection information.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Boessenkool, Sanne
Star, Bastiaan
Scofield, R. Paul
Seddon, Philip J.
Waters, Jonathan M.
spellingShingle Boessenkool, Sanne
Star, Bastiaan
Scofield, R. Paul
Seddon, Philip J.
Waters, Jonathan M.
Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
author_facet Boessenkool, Sanne
Star, Bastiaan
Scofield, R. Paul
Seddon, Philip J.
Waters, Jonathan M.
author_sort Boessenkool, Sanne
title Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
title_short Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
title_full Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
title_fullStr Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
title_full_unstemmed Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
title_sort lost in translation or deliberate falsification? genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2009
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
volume 277, issue 1684, page 1057-1064
ISSN 0962-8452 1471-2954
op_rights https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1837
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
container_volume 277
container_issue 1684
container_start_page 1057
op_container_end_page 1064
_version_ 1811637975246700544