Prehistoric versus modern Baltic Sea cod fisheries: selectivity across the millennia

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
• Main Authors: Limburg, Karin E, Walther, Yvonne, Hong, Bongghi, Olson, Carina, Storå, Jan
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: The Royal Society 2008
• Subjects: North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0711; https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2008.0711; https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rspb.2008.0711

Combining Stone Age and modern data provides unique insights for management, extending beyond contemporary problems and shifting baselines. Using fish chronometric parts, we compared demographic characteristics of exploited cod populations from the Neolithic Period (4500 BP) to the modern highly exploited fishery in the central Baltic Sea. We found that Neolithic cod were larger (mean 56.4 cm, 95% confidence interval (CI)±0.9) than modern fish (weighted mean length in catch =49.5±0.2 cm in 1995, 48.2±0.2 cm in 2003), and older (mean ages =4.7±0.11, 3.1±0.02 and 3.6±0.02 years for Neolithic, 1995, and 2003 fisheries, respectively). Fishery-independent surveys in 1995 and 2003 show that mean sizes in the stock are 16–17 cm smaller than reflected in the fishery, and mean ages approximately 1–1.5 years younger. Modelled von Bertalanffy growth and back-calculated lengths indicated that Neolithic cod grew to smaller asymptotic lengths, but were larger at younger ages, implying rapid early growth. Very small Neolithic cod were absent and large individuals were rare as in modern times. This could be owing to selective harvests, the absence of small and large fish in the area or a combination. Comparing modern and prehistoric times, fishery selection is evident, but apparently not as great as in the North Atlantic proper.