Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds

Understanding links between habitat characteristics and foraging efficiency helps predict how environmental changes influence populations of top predators. This study examines whether measurements of prey (clupeids) availability varied over stratification gradients, and determined if any of those me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology Letters
Main Authors: Waggitt, James J., Cazenave, Pierre W., Howarth, Leigh M., Evans, Peter G. H., van der Kooij, Jeroen, Hiddink, Jan G.
Other Authors: UK Energy Research Centre, Natural Environment Research Council
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
id crroyalsociety:10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
record_format openpolar
spelling crroyalsociety:10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348 2024-09-15T18:02:42+00:00 Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds Waggitt, James J. Cazenave, Pierre W. Howarth, Leigh M. Evans, Peter G. H. van der Kooij, Jeroen Hiddink, Jan G. UK Energy Research Centre Natural Environment Research Council 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348 en eng The Royal Society https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ Biology Letters volume 14, issue 8, page 20180348 ISSN 1744-9561 1744-957X journal-article 2018 crroyalsociety https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348 2024-08-05T04:35:22Z Understanding links between habitat characteristics and foraging efficiency helps predict how environmental changes influence populations of top predators. This study examines whether measurements of prey (clupeids) availability varied over stratification gradients, and determined if any of those measurements coincided with aggregations of foraging seabirds (common guillemot Uria aalge and Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus ) in the Celtic Sea, UK. The probability of encountering foraging seabirds was highest around fronts between mixed and stratified water. Prey were denser and shallower in mixed water, whilst encounters with prey were most frequent in stratified water. Therefore, no single measurement of increased prey availability coincided with the location of fronts. However, when considered in combination, overall prey availability was highest in these areas. These results show that top predators may select foraging habitats by trading-off several measurements of prey availability. By showing that top predators select areas where prey switch between behaviours, these results also identify a mechanism that could explain the wider importance of edge habitats for these taxa. As offshore developments (e.g. marine renewable energy installations) change patterns of stratification, their construction may have consequences on the foraging efficiency of seabirds. Article in Journal/Newspaper common guillemot Uria aalge uria The Royal Society Biology Letters 14 8 20180348
institution Open Polar
collection The Royal Society
op_collection_id crroyalsociety
language English
description Understanding links between habitat characteristics and foraging efficiency helps predict how environmental changes influence populations of top predators. This study examines whether measurements of prey (clupeids) availability varied over stratification gradients, and determined if any of those measurements coincided with aggregations of foraging seabirds (common guillemot Uria aalge and Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus ) in the Celtic Sea, UK. The probability of encountering foraging seabirds was highest around fronts between mixed and stratified water. Prey were denser and shallower in mixed water, whilst encounters with prey were most frequent in stratified water. Therefore, no single measurement of increased prey availability coincided with the location of fronts. However, when considered in combination, overall prey availability was highest in these areas. These results show that top predators may select foraging habitats by trading-off several measurements of prey availability. By showing that top predators select areas where prey switch between behaviours, these results also identify a mechanism that could explain the wider importance of edge habitats for these taxa. As offshore developments (e.g. marine renewable energy installations) change patterns of stratification, their construction may have consequences on the foraging efficiency of seabirds.
author2 UK Energy Research Centre
Natural Environment Research Council
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Waggitt, James J.
Cazenave, Pierre W.
Howarth, Leigh M.
Evans, Peter G. H.
van der Kooij, Jeroen
Hiddink, Jan G.
spellingShingle Waggitt, James J.
Cazenave, Pierre W.
Howarth, Leigh M.
Evans, Peter G. H.
van der Kooij, Jeroen
Hiddink, Jan G.
Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
author_facet Waggitt, James J.
Cazenave, Pierre W.
Howarth, Leigh M.
Evans, Peter G. H.
van der Kooij, Jeroen
Hiddink, Jan G.
author_sort Waggitt, James J.
title Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
title_short Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
title_full Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
title_fullStr Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
title_full_unstemmed Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
title_sort combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
genre common guillemot
Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet common guillemot
Uria aalge
uria
op_source Biology Letters
volume 14, issue 8, page 20180348
ISSN 1744-9561 1744-957X
op_rights https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348
container_title Biology Letters
container_volume 14
container_issue 8
container_start_page 20180348
_version_ 1810440129532133376