A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs

Maintaining polymorphisms for genes with effects of ecological significance may involve conflicting selection in males and females. We present data from a captive population of ruffs ( Philomachus pugnax ) showing that a dominant allele controls development into both small, ‘female mimic’ males (‘fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology Letters
Main Authors: Lank, David B., Farrell, Lindsay L., Burke, Terry, Piersma, Theunis, McRae, Susan B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
id crroyalsociety:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
record_format openpolar
spelling crroyalsociety:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653 2024-06-02T08:13:12+00:00 A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs Lank, David B. Farrell, Lindsay L. Burke, Terry Piersma, Theunis McRae, Susan B. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653 en eng The Royal Society https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ Biology Letters volume 9, issue 6, page 20130653 ISSN 1744-9561 1744-957X journal-article 2013 crroyalsociety https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653 2024-05-07T14:16:13Z Maintaining polymorphisms for genes with effects of ecological significance may involve conflicting selection in males and females. We present data from a captive population of ruffs ( Philomachus pugnax ) showing that a dominant allele controls development into both small, ‘female mimic’ males (‘faeders’), and a previously undescribed class of small ‘female faeders’. Most male ruffs have elaborate breeding plumage and display behaviour, but 0.5–1.5% are faeders, which lack both. Females from a captive population previously lacking faeders were bred with two founder faeder males and their faeder sons. The faeders’ offspring had a quadrimodal size distribution comprising normal-sized males and females, faeders and atypically small females. By contrast, ornamented males fathered only normal-sized offspring. We conclude that both founding faeders were heterozygous for a faeder allele absent from the original population. This allele is dominant to previously described genes that determine development into independent versus satellite ornamented males. Unlike those genes, the faeder allele is clearly expressed in females. Small body size is a component of the male faeder mating strategy, but provides no obvious benefit to females. Bisexual expression of the gene provides the opportunity to quantify the strength of sexually antagonistic selection on a Mendelian trait. Article in Journal/Newspaper Philomachus pugnax The Royal Society Biology Letters 9 6 20130653
institution Open Polar
collection The Royal Society
op_collection_id crroyalsociety
language English
description Maintaining polymorphisms for genes with effects of ecological significance may involve conflicting selection in males and females. We present data from a captive population of ruffs ( Philomachus pugnax ) showing that a dominant allele controls development into both small, ‘female mimic’ males (‘faeders’), and a previously undescribed class of small ‘female faeders’. Most male ruffs have elaborate breeding plumage and display behaviour, but 0.5–1.5% are faeders, which lack both. Females from a captive population previously lacking faeders were bred with two founder faeder males and their faeder sons. The faeders’ offspring had a quadrimodal size distribution comprising normal-sized males and females, faeders and atypically small females. By contrast, ornamented males fathered only normal-sized offspring. We conclude that both founding faeders were heterozygous for a faeder allele absent from the original population. This allele is dominant to previously described genes that determine development into independent versus satellite ornamented males. Unlike those genes, the faeder allele is clearly expressed in females. Small body size is a component of the male faeder mating strategy, but provides no obvious benefit to females. Bisexual expression of the gene provides the opportunity to quantify the strength of sexually antagonistic selection on a Mendelian trait.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lank, David B.
Farrell, Lindsay L.
Burke, Terry
Piersma, Theunis
McRae, Susan B.
spellingShingle Lank, David B.
Farrell, Lindsay L.
Burke, Terry
Piersma, Theunis
McRae, Susan B.
A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
author_facet Lank, David B.
Farrell, Lindsay L.
Burke, Terry
Piersma, Theunis
McRae, Susan B.
author_sort Lank, David B.
title A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
title_short A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
title_full A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
title_fullStr A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
title_full_unstemmed A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
title_sort dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
genre Philomachus pugnax
genre_facet Philomachus pugnax
op_source Biology Letters
volume 9, issue 6, page 20130653
ISSN 1744-9561 1744-957X
op_rights https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0653
container_title Biology Letters
container_volume 9
container_issue 6
container_start_page 20130653
_version_ 1800736611251519488