Conclusion

This concluding chapter summarizes the book's main findings, showing how vulnerability can increase national solidarity allowing institutions to be built that work for a country's collective benefit, allowing it to stay afloat when a crisis strikes. Denmark, Ireland, and Switzerland exempl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Campbell, John L., Hall, John A.
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Princeton University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005
id crprincetonpr:10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005
record_format openpolar
spelling crprincetonpr:10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005 2024-06-02T08:09:14+00:00 Conclusion Campbell, John L. Hall, John A. 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005 unknown Princeton University Press The Paradox of Vulnerability book-chapter 2017 crprincetonpr https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005 2024-05-07T14:14:59Z This concluding chapter summarizes the book's main findings, showing how vulnerability can increase national solidarity allowing institutions to be built that work for a country's collective benefit, allowing it to stay afloat when a crisis strikes. Denmark, Ireland, and Switzerland exemplify the book's argument about the paradox of vulnerability, albeit with interesting nuances in the Irish and Swiss cases. The chapter also considers the differences in the ways that the three nation-states handled the 2008 financial crisis before turning to additional cases to see whether the book's argument can withstand further scrutiny. In particular, it discusses the experiences of Greece and Iceland in handling the 2008 financial crisis, noting that the former demonstrated little resilience in the face of the crisis and that thick institutions played a pivotal role in its resolution in the latter. Book Part Iceland Princeton University Press
institution Open Polar
collection Princeton University Press
op_collection_id crprincetonpr
language unknown
description This concluding chapter summarizes the book's main findings, showing how vulnerability can increase national solidarity allowing institutions to be built that work for a country's collective benefit, allowing it to stay afloat when a crisis strikes. Denmark, Ireland, and Switzerland exemplify the book's argument about the paradox of vulnerability, albeit with interesting nuances in the Irish and Swiss cases. The chapter also considers the differences in the ways that the three nation-states handled the 2008 financial crisis before turning to additional cases to see whether the book's argument can withstand further scrutiny. In particular, it discusses the experiences of Greece and Iceland in handling the 2008 financial crisis, noting that the former demonstrated little resilience in the face of the crisis and that thick institutions played a pivotal role in its resolution in the latter.
format Book Part
author Campbell, John L.
Hall, John A.
spellingShingle Campbell, John L.
Hall, John A.
Conclusion
author_facet Campbell, John L.
Hall, John A.
author_sort Campbell, John L.
title Conclusion
title_short Conclusion
title_full Conclusion
title_fullStr Conclusion
title_full_unstemmed Conclusion
title_sort conclusion
publisher Princeton University Press
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source The Paradox of Vulnerability
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691163260.003.0005
_version_ 1800754912325271552