Effects of telemetry collars on two free-roaming feral equid species

• Published in: PLOS ONE
• Main Authors: Schoenecker, Kathryn A., King, Sarah R. B., Hennig, Jacob D., Cole, Mary J., Scasta, J. Derek, Beck, Jeffrey L.
• Other Authors: Grignolio, Stefano, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming Department of Agriculture
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024
• Subjects: Canada; Antarc*; Antarctica
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303312; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303312

There are two species of free-roaming feral equids in North America: horses ( Equus caballus ) and donkeys or “burros” ( E . asinus ). Both species were introduced as domestic animals to North America in the early 1500s and currently inhabit rangelands across the western United States, Canada, and all continents except Antarctica. Despite their global distribution, little is known about their fine scale spatial ecology. Contemporary research tools to assess space use include global positioning system (GPS) tracking collars, but older models were problematic due to stiff collar belting causing poor fit. We tested modern designs of GPS collars on n = 105 horses and n = 60 burros for 4 years in five populations (3 horse, 2 burro) across the western United States, to assess whether collars posed welfare risks to horses or burros. We found no difference in survival of collared versus uncollared mares and jennies, and no difference in survival of their foals. In 4036 of 4307 observations for horses (93.7%) and 2115 of 2258 observations for burros (93.6%), collars were observed symmetrical, maintaining proper fit on the neck. Fur effects from collars (sweaty neck, indented fur, broken fur) were seen in 3% of horse observations and 25% of burro observations. Superficial effects (chafes and marks on skin surface) were seen in 2% of horse observations and 11% of burro observations; no severe effects from collars were seen. Body condition was not affected by collars; mean body condition of collared horses was 4.70 ± 0.54 (mean ± s.d) and 4.71 ± 0.65 for collared burros. Behavior results indicated minimal effects; collared horses stood slightly more than uncollared, and collared burros stood and foraged more in one population, but not in the other. For 6.3% of observations of horses and 6.4% of observations of burros, we found an effect of time wearing a collar on the cumulative sum of fur effects which increased over time (burros: r s = 0.87, P = <0.0001; horses: r s = 0.31, P = 0.002). Burros also showed an increase ...