Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey

Background Captive cetacean attractions are growing in number globally, their operators citing entertainment, education, and conservation as benefits. Those for and against developing such attractions claim public support. Previous public opinion research, however, shows little consensus, partly due...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ
Main Authors: Wassermann, Sophia N., Hind-Ozan, Edward J., Seaman, Julia
Other Authors: School for Field Studies Center for Marine Resource Studies, Turks and Caicos Department of Environment and Marine Affairs
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: PeerJ 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5953
https://peerj.com/articles/5953.pdf
https://peerj.com/articles/5953.xml
https://peerj.com/articles/5953.html
id crpeerj:10.7717/peerj.5953
record_format openpolar
spelling crpeerj:10.7717/peerj.5953 2024-06-02T08:09:50+00:00 Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey Wassermann, Sophia N. Hind-Ozan, Edward J. Seaman, Julia School for Field Studies Center for Marine Resource Studies Turks and Caicos Department of Environment and Marine Affairs 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5953 https://peerj.com/articles/5953.pdf https://peerj.com/articles/5953.xml https://peerj.com/articles/5953.html en eng PeerJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ PeerJ volume 6, page e5953 ISSN 2167-8359 journal-article 2018 crpeerj https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5953 2024-05-07T14:13:58Z Background Captive cetacean attractions are growing in number globally, their operators citing entertainment, education, and conservation as benefits. Those for and against developing such attractions claim public support. Previous public opinion research, however, shows little consensus, partly due to the introduction of biases in study design that influence participants’ responses. Those involved in, or concerned with, developing and licensing these attractions need to better understand what drives the lack of consensus to take socially-acceptable decisions. Methods We reviewed previous research on public opinion of cetacean captivity, noting possible sources of bias. Survey question wording can be a major source of introduced bias, so we used an open-ended photo elicitation approach. We showed tourists in the Turks Caicos Islands ( N = 292) images of a marine mammal park (MMP) killer whale show and a swim-with-the-dolphins (SWTD) attraction and asked for their qualitative comments on the potential development of each. They also indicated how likely they would be to visit each on a Likert scale. Results Respondents were generally against visiting MMP killer whale shows, with 60.9% not likely to visit. SWTD attractions were more popular; 60.3% were likely to visit. For SWTD, USA residents were more likely to visit; older respondents and those staying in all-inclusive resorts were less likely. Those staying in all-inclusive resorts were also less likely to visit MMP killer whale shows. The great majority of qualitative comments centred on either entertainment value or animal welfare concerns. There were very few, if any, comments on the education or conservation value of these attractions. Discussion Our findings contradict several previous studies on public opinion of captive cetaceans that did not use photo elicitation. The support shown for MMP killer whale shows in this survey was well below that claimed by studies conducted on behalf of captive cetacean attraction operators. Opposition to SWTD was also ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Killer Whale Killer whale PeerJ Publishing PeerJ 6 e5953
institution Open Polar
collection PeerJ Publishing
op_collection_id crpeerj
language English
description Background Captive cetacean attractions are growing in number globally, their operators citing entertainment, education, and conservation as benefits. Those for and against developing such attractions claim public support. Previous public opinion research, however, shows little consensus, partly due to the introduction of biases in study design that influence participants’ responses. Those involved in, or concerned with, developing and licensing these attractions need to better understand what drives the lack of consensus to take socially-acceptable decisions. Methods We reviewed previous research on public opinion of cetacean captivity, noting possible sources of bias. Survey question wording can be a major source of introduced bias, so we used an open-ended photo elicitation approach. We showed tourists in the Turks Caicos Islands ( N = 292) images of a marine mammal park (MMP) killer whale show and a swim-with-the-dolphins (SWTD) attraction and asked for their qualitative comments on the potential development of each. They also indicated how likely they would be to visit each on a Likert scale. Results Respondents were generally against visiting MMP killer whale shows, with 60.9% not likely to visit. SWTD attractions were more popular; 60.3% were likely to visit. For SWTD, USA residents were more likely to visit; older respondents and those staying in all-inclusive resorts were less likely. Those staying in all-inclusive resorts were also less likely to visit MMP killer whale shows. The great majority of qualitative comments centred on either entertainment value or animal welfare concerns. There were very few, if any, comments on the education or conservation value of these attractions. Discussion Our findings contradict several previous studies on public opinion of captive cetaceans that did not use photo elicitation. The support shown for MMP killer whale shows in this survey was well below that claimed by studies conducted on behalf of captive cetacean attraction operators. Opposition to SWTD was also ...
author2 School for Field Studies Center for Marine Resource Studies
Turks and Caicos Department of Environment and Marine Affairs
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wassermann, Sophia N.
Hind-Ozan, Edward J.
Seaman, Julia
spellingShingle Wassermann, Sophia N.
Hind-Ozan, Edward J.
Seaman, Julia
Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
author_facet Wassermann, Sophia N.
Hind-Ozan, Edward J.
Seaman, Julia
author_sort Wassermann, Sophia N.
title Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
title_short Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
title_full Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
title_fullStr Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
title_full_unstemmed Reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
title_sort reassessing public opinion of captive cetacean attractions with a photo elicitation survey
publisher PeerJ
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5953
https://peerj.com/articles/5953.pdf
https://peerj.com/articles/5953.xml
https://peerj.com/articles/5953.html
genre Killer Whale
Killer whale
genre_facet Killer Whale
Killer whale
op_source PeerJ
volume 6, page e5953
ISSN 2167-8359
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5953
container_title PeerJ
container_volume 6
container_start_page e5953
_version_ 1800755627094441984