Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).

Bibliographic Details
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: PeerJ 2017
Subjects:
King George Island
Seymour
Seymour Island
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2
id crpeerj:10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2
record_format openpolar
spelling crpeerj:10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2 2024-06-02T08:09:52+00:00 Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene). 2017-02-16T09:07:51Z http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2 unknown PeerJ component 2017 crpeerj https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2 2024-05-07T14:14:20Z Other/Unknown Material King George Island Seymour Island PeerJ Publishing King George Island Seymour ENVELOPE(-56.767,-56.767,-64.283,-64.283) Seymour Island ENVELOPE(-56.750,-56.750,-64.283,-64.283)
institution Open Polar
collection PeerJ Publishing
op_collection_id crpeerj
language unknown
format Other/Unknown Material
title Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).
spellingShingle Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).
title_short Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).
title_full Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).
title_fullStr Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).
title_full_unstemmed Figure 2: Comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the Hindon Maar (Miocene), Double Hill (Miocene), Kaikorai Valley (Miocene), King George Island (Palaeocene/Eocene) and Seymour Island (Palaeocene/Eocene).
title_sort figure 2: comparison of the percentages of functional feeding groups and the percentage of damaged leaves present at the hindon maar (miocene), double hill (miocene), kaikorai valley (miocene), king george island (palaeocene/eocene) and seymour island (palaeocene/eocene).
publisher PeerJ
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.767,-56.767,-64.283,-64.283)
ENVELOPE(-56.750,-56.750,-64.283,-64.283)
geographic King George Island
Seymour
Seymour Island
geographic_facet King George Island
Seymour
Seymour Island
genre King George Island
Seymour Island
genre_facet King George Island
Seymour Island
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2985/fig-2
_version_ 1800755651375267840

Similar Items