Degreasing and bleaching bones using light sources as a tool to increase the safety of teaching osteology at the University of Veterinary Sciences Brno

• Published in: PeerJ
• Main Authors: Horák, Ondřej, Pyszko, Martin, Páral, Václav, Šandor, Ondřej
• Other Authors: The University of Veterinary Sciences Brno paid the APC for this article
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: PeerJ 2022
• Subjects: Canis lupus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14036; https://peerj.com/articles/14036.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/14036.xml; https://peerj.com/articles/14036.html

The key part of creating bone material for teaching is degreasing and whitening it. However, the substances used are often dangerous and toxic. We tested and compared safer methods based on two physical variables. These are light and heat. The material for our study was 45 femurs from 23 adult domestic dogs ( Canis lupus f. familiaris ). The bones were divided into three groups of 15 pieces according to the method used to remove muscles and ligaments from their surface. Five femurs from each group were exposed to three different light sources for 28 days—sunlight, warm light from a classical incandescent light bulb and cold light by a LED bulb. At regular intervals, the change in the colour of the bone surface and the amount of fat loss from the medullary cavity was also monitored. The best degreasing and bleaching results were achieved in macerated bones exposed to sunlight. They achieved the required condition as early as 21 days after the start of sun exposure. The biggest problem was haemoglobin, which permeated through the Haversian canals and discoloured the bone tissue. The results showed that the use of light and heat is a suitable and safe alternative to chemical methods of degreasing and bleaching bones. The disadvantage is the length of time, especially for native material.