Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data

The volume and coverage of spatial data has increased dramatically in recent years, with Earth observation programmes producing dozens of GB of data on a daily basis. The term Big Spatial Data is now applied to data sets that impose real challenges to researchers and practitioners alike. As rule, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Sousa, Luís Moreira
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: PeerJ 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215
https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.pdf
https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.html
https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.xml
id crpeerj:10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215
record_format openpolar
spelling crpeerj:10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215 2024-06-02T07:56:31+00:00 Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data de Sousa, Luís Moreira 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215 https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.pdf https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.html https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.xml unknown PeerJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ posted-content 2018 crpeerj https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215 2024-05-07T14:14:25Z The volume and coverage of spatial data has increased dramatically in recent years, with Earth observation programmes producing dozens of GB of data on a daily basis. The term Big Spatial Data is now applied to data sets that impose real challenges to researchers and practitioners alike. As rule, these data are provided in highly irregular geodesic grids, defined along equal intervals of latitude and longitude, a vastly inefficient and burdensome topology. Compounding the problem, users of such data end up taking geodesic coordinates in these grids as a Cartesian system, implicitly applying Marinus of Tyre's projection. A first approach towards the compactness of global geo-spatial data is to work in a Cartesian system produced by an equal-area projection. There are a good number to choose from, but those supported by common GIS software invariably relate to the sinusoidal or pseudo-cylindrical families, that impose important distortions of shape and distance. The land masses of Antarctica, Alaska, Canada, Greenland and Russia are particularly distorted with such projections. A more effective approach is to store and work with data in modern cartographic projections, in particular those defined with the Platonic and Archimedean solids. In spite of various attempts at open source software supporting these projections, in practice they remain today largely out of reach to GIS practitioners. This communication reviews persisting difficulties in working with global big spatial data, current strategies to address such difficulties, the compromises they impose and the remaining gaps in open source software. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctica Greenland Alaska PeerJ Publishing Canada Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection PeerJ Publishing
op_collection_id crpeerj
language unknown
description The volume and coverage of spatial data has increased dramatically in recent years, with Earth observation programmes producing dozens of GB of data on a daily basis. The term Big Spatial Data is now applied to data sets that impose real challenges to researchers and practitioners alike. As rule, these data are provided in highly irregular geodesic grids, defined along equal intervals of latitude and longitude, a vastly inefficient and burdensome topology. Compounding the problem, users of such data end up taking geodesic coordinates in these grids as a Cartesian system, implicitly applying Marinus of Tyre's projection. A first approach towards the compactness of global geo-spatial data is to work in a Cartesian system produced by an equal-area projection. There are a good number to choose from, but those supported by common GIS software invariably relate to the sinusoidal or pseudo-cylindrical families, that impose important distortions of shape and distance. The land masses of Antarctica, Alaska, Canada, Greenland and Russia are particularly distorted with such projections. A more effective approach is to store and work with data in modern cartographic projections, in particular those defined with the Platonic and Archimedean solids. In spite of various attempts at open source software supporting these projections, in practice they remain today largely out of reach to GIS practitioners. This communication reviews persisting difficulties in working with global big spatial data, current strategies to address such difficulties, the compromises they impose and the remaining gaps in open source software.
format Other/Unknown Material
author de Sousa, Luís Moreira
spellingShingle de Sousa, Luís Moreira
Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
author_facet de Sousa, Luís Moreira
author_sort de Sousa, Luís Moreira
title Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
title_short Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
title_full Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
title_fullStr Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
title_full_unstemmed Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
title_sort remaining gaps in open source software for big spatial data
publisher PeerJ
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215
https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.pdf
https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.html
https://peerj.com/preprints/27215.xml
geographic Canada
Greenland
geographic_facet Canada
Greenland
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Greenland
Alaska
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Greenland
Alaska
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27215
_version_ 1800756632499519488