Large-scale culturing of the subpolar foraminifera Globigerina bulloides reveals tolerance to a large range of environmental parameters associated to different life-strategies and an extended lifespan

• Published in: Journal of Plankton Research
• Main Authors: Sykes, Freya E, Meilland, Julie, Westgård, Adele, Chalk, Thomas B, Chierici, Melissa, Foster, Gavin L, Ezat, Mohamed M
• Other Authors: Dolan, John, Tromsø Research Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via the Cluster of Excellence, European Research Council, Research Council of Norway’s Centres of Excellence
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2024
• Subjects: Nordic Seas
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbae029; https://academic.oup.com/plankt/article-pdf/46/4/403/58697215/fbae029.pdf

Abstract The subtropical to subpolar planktic foraminifera Globigerina bulloides is a calcifying marine protist, and one of the dominant foraminiferal species of the Nordic Seas. Previously, the relative abundance and shell geochemistry of fossil G. bulloides have been studied for palaeoceanographic reconstructions. There is however a lack of biological observations on the species and a poor understanding of its ecological tolerances, especially for high latitude genotypes. Here, we present observations from the first extensive culturing of G. bulloides under subpolar conditions, including the first low temperature (6–13°C) and variable salinity (30–38) experiments. Carbonate chemistry (pH and [CO32−]) was also manipulated. Experimental conditions were chosen to reflect a range of plausible past and future scenarios for the Nordic Seas. We found G. bulloides to be tolerant of environmental conditions well outside their optimal range (<10°C, salinity <33, pH <8). Observed life span was up to three months, which was attributed to a microalgal diet. Two alternative life strategies were employed, whereby individuals either experienced rapid growth and death, or a prolonged lifespan with minimal growth and death via slow decay. We posit this could help explain differences in geochemical signals recorded from different size fractions of fossil specimens used for palaeoceanographic reconstructions.