The “Dorset Problem” Revisited

The origins and development of Dorset culture, recognized in 1925 by Diamond Jenness, remain poorly understood despite decades of research. This chapter considers how Dorset was initially defined, before highlighting the three competing theories proposed to explain the transition from Pre-Dorset to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan, Karen
Other Authors: Friesen, Max, Mason, Owen
Format: Book
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37 2023-05-15T15:01:43+02:00 The “Dorset Problem” Revisited Ryan, Karen Friesen, Max Mason, Owen 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Handbooks Online book 2016 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37 2022-09-30T10:05:47Z The origins and development of Dorset culture, recognized in 1925 by Diamond Jenness, remain poorly understood despite decades of research. This chapter considers how Dorset was initially defined, before highlighting the three competing theories proposed to explain the transition from Pre-Dorset to Dorset: the first arguing for widespread continuity and gradual change from Pre-Dorset into Dorset throughout the Eastern Arctic; the second contending that large-scale population discontinuities occurred as regional Pre-Dorset groups were replaced by a single expanding “Core Area” Dorset populace; with the third envisioning a more complex demographic history involving local developments and multiple minicore areas. Following this, the traits most frequently used to distinguish Early and Middle Dorset are summarized before the ramifications of new analyses on the perceived culture-historical position of Early and Middle Dorset are discussed. Book Arctic Dorset culture Oxford University Press (via Crossref) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description The origins and development of Dorset culture, recognized in 1925 by Diamond Jenness, remain poorly understood despite decades of research. This chapter considers how Dorset was initially defined, before highlighting the three competing theories proposed to explain the transition from Pre-Dorset to Dorset: the first arguing for widespread continuity and gradual change from Pre-Dorset into Dorset throughout the Eastern Arctic; the second contending that large-scale population discontinuities occurred as regional Pre-Dorset groups were replaced by a single expanding “Core Area” Dorset populace; with the third envisioning a more complex demographic history involving local developments and multiple minicore areas. Following this, the traits most frequently used to distinguish Early and Middle Dorset are summarized before the ramifications of new analyses on the perceived culture-historical position of Early and Middle Dorset are discussed.
author2 Friesen, Max
Mason, Owen
format Book
author Ryan, Karen
spellingShingle Ryan, Karen
The “Dorset Problem” Revisited
author_facet Ryan, Karen
author_sort Ryan, Karen
title The “Dorset Problem” Revisited
title_short The “Dorset Problem” Revisited
title_full The “Dorset Problem” Revisited
title_fullStr The “Dorset Problem” Revisited
title_full_unstemmed The “Dorset Problem” Revisited
title_sort “dorset problem” revisited
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Dorset culture
genre_facet Arctic
Dorset culture
op_source Oxford Handbooks Online
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199766956.013.37
_version_ 1766333730348072960