Turns to the Present

Varieties of social History comprised the most successful initial challenge to political History, especially from the middle of the twentieth century. From the 1980s social History was gradually supplanted in prominence by a cluster of related historiographical developments concerned with language a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bloxham, Donald
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008 2023-05-15T17:34:40+02:00 Turns to the Present Bloxham, Donald 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008 unknown Oxford University Press Why History? page 246-303 book-chapter 2020 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008 2022-08-05T10:30:56Z Varieties of social History comprised the most successful initial challenge to political History, especially from the middle of the twentieth century. From the 1980s social History was gradually supplanted in prominence by a cluster of related historiographical developments concerned with language and culture. In the last fifteen years or so newer fashions have waxed, and to those too this chapter will attend, but, in terms of justifications for History, social History and the linguistic and cultural ‘turns’ remain especially important. Social-scientific social historians were more apt to assert History’s predictive value or at least its pragmatic contemporary importance at a time of industrialization beyond the north Atlantic—this was an update of History as Practical Lesson. Other social historians were to be found revising prevailing conceptions of the past with a view to altering politics in the present—disturbing ‘whiggish’ narratives, or inserting the marginalized into the historical record to fortify their voices now. This was History as Identity fused with History as Emancipation. ‘New cultural historians’ specialized in a version of History as Travel as they invoked exotic worlds past. They, like historians under the influence of Michel Foucault, who addressed culture through the prism of power, might adapt the Travel rationale, contrasting past ways of doing things with present ways in order to unmask the conventional, made and remade, character of social relations and of human-being, and thus the possibility of changing them. This was a Marxist agenda of History as Emancipation adapted for a post-Marxist philosophy. Book Part North Atlantic Oxford University Press (via Crossref) 246 303
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description Varieties of social History comprised the most successful initial challenge to political History, especially from the middle of the twentieth century. From the 1980s social History was gradually supplanted in prominence by a cluster of related historiographical developments concerned with language and culture. In the last fifteen years or so newer fashions have waxed, and to those too this chapter will attend, but, in terms of justifications for History, social History and the linguistic and cultural ‘turns’ remain especially important. Social-scientific social historians were more apt to assert History’s predictive value or at least its pragmatic contemporary importance at a time of industrialization beyond the north Atlantic—this was an update of History as Practical Lesson. Other social historians were to be found revising prevailing conceptions of the past with a view to altering politics in the present—disturbing ‘whiggish’ narratives, or inserting the marginalized into the historical record to fortify their voices now. This was History as Identity fused with History as Emancipation. ‘New cultural historians’ specialized in a version of History as Travel as they invoked exotic worlds past. They, like historians under the influence of Michel Foucault, who addressed culture through the prism of power, might adapt the Travel rationale, contrasting past ways of doing things with present ways in order to unmask the conventional, made and remade, character of social relations and of human-being, and thus the possibility of changing them. This was a Marxist agenda of History as Emancipation adapted for a post-Marxist philosophy.
format Book Part
author Bloxham, Donald
spellingShingle Bloxham, Donald
Turns to the Present
author_facet Bloxham, Donald
author_sort Bloxham, Donald
title Turns to the Present
title_short Turns to the Present
title_full Turns to the Present
title_fullStr Turns to the Present
title_full_unstemmed Turns to the Present
title_sort turns to the present
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Why History?
page 246-303
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858720.003.0008
container_start_page 246
op_container_end_page 303
_version_ 1766133568230129664