Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement
Erik Franckx and Marco Benatar consider the peculiar backlash in the form of states rejecting the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals (ICs). They discuss how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) rejected jurisdiction in the Philippines v PRC arbitration. The authors draw comparisons w...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 |
id |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 2023-05-15T15:03:30+02:00 Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement Franckx, Erik Benatar, Marco 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Scholarship Online book 2018 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 2022-08-05T10:30:16Z Erik Franckx and Marco Benatar consider the peculiar backlash in the form of states rejecting the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals (ICs). They discuss how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) rejected jurisdiction in the Philippines v PRC arbitration. The authors draw comparisons with how the Russian Federation rejected the jurisdiction of an arbitration panel in the Arctic Sunrise case. But both states participated in the peculiar form of forwarding ‘position papers’. This allows states new modes of influencing the bench without formally participating in the proceedings, argues Franckx and Benatar. This may tempt other states to apply a similar approach. For example, Croatia has presented its views to an arbitration panel in a dispute with Slovenia, despite its non-participation after irregularities by one of the arbitrators. The PRC and the Russian Federation have also issued a joint declaration encouraging non-participation in international legal proceedings. Book Arctic Oxford University Press (via Crossref) Arctic The Bench ENVELOPE(-53.181,-53.181,49.767,49.767) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Oxford University Press (via Crossref) |
op_collection_id |
croxfordunivpr |
language |
unknown |
description |
Erik Franckx and Marco Benatar consider the peculiar backlash in the form of states rejecting the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals (ICs). They discuss how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) rejected jurisdiction in the Philippines v PRC arbitration. The authors draw comparisons with how the Russian Federation rejected the jurisdiction of an arbitration panel in the Arctic Sunrise case. But both states participated in the peculiar form of forwarding ‘position papers’. This allows states new modes of influencing the bench without formally participating in the proceedings, argues Franckx and Benatar. This may tempt other states to apply a similar approach. For example, Croatia has presented its views to an arbitration panel in a dispute with Slovenia, despite its non-participation after irregularities by one of the arbitrators. The PRC and the Russian Federation have also issued a joint declaration encouraging non-participation in international legal proceedings. |
format |
Book |
author |
Franckx, Erik Benatar, Marco |
spellingShingle |
Franckx, Erik Benatar, Marco Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement |
author_facet |
Franckx, Erik Benatar, Marco |
author_sort |
Franckx, Erik |
title |
Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement |
title_short |
Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement |
title_full |
Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement |
title_fullStr |
Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement |
title_sort |
non-participation in compulsory procedures of dispute settlement |
publisher |
Oxford University Press |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-53.181,-53.181,49.767,49.767) |
geographic |
Arctic The Bench |
geographic_facet |
Arctic The Bench |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
Oxford Scholarship Online |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0010 |
_version_ |
1766335355824373760 |