Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries

The book starts its empirical section in the most-likely case of party influence: Four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Analysing parliamentary survey data, it is argued that a very large proportion of voting unity can be explained by there simply being a lack of policy incen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Willumsen, David M.
Format: Book
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 2023-05-15T16:49:36+02:00 Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries Willumsen, David M. 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Scholarship Online book 2017 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 2022-08-05T10:29:33Z The book starts its empirical section in the most-likely case of party influence: Four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Analysing parliamentary survey data, it is argued that a very large proportion of voting unity can be explained by there simply being a lack of policy incentives to defect from the party line for a very large proportion of the members of the Nordic parliaments. However, it is also shown that preferences alone cannot explain the near-perfect voting unity found in these countries. Modelling legislators’ attitudes to party unity, the chapter shows that the most credible explanation of their decision to vote the party line against their preferred policy position is that MPs are aware of the long-term benefits of belonging to a united political party, and are willing to incur the short-term cost of voting against their preferred policy in order to obtain these benefits. Book Iceland Oxford University Press (via Crossref) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description The book starts its empirical section in the most-likely case of party influence: Four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Analysing parliamentary survey data, it is argued that a very large proportion of voting unity can be explained by there simply being a lack of policy incentives to defect from the party line for a very large proportion of the members of the Nordic parliaments. However, it is also shown that preferences alone cannot explain the near-perfect voting unity found in these countries. Modelling legislators’ attitudes to party unity, the chapter shows that the most credible explanation of their decision to vote the party line against their preferred policy position is that MPs are aware of the long-term benefits of belonging to a united political party, and are willing to incur the short-term cost of voting against their preferred policy in order to obtain these benefits.
format Book
author Willumsen, David M.
spellingShingle Willumsen, David M.
Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
author_facet Willumsen, David M.
author_sort Willumsen, David M.
title Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
title_short Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
title_full Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
title_fullStr Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
title_sort attitudes to party unity in the nordic countries
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Oxford Scholarship Online
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003
_version_ 1766039729335173120