Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries
The book starts its empirical section in the most-likely case of party influence: Four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Analysing parliamentary survey data, it is argued that a very large proportion of voting unity can be explained by there simply being a lack of policy incen...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 |
id |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 2023-05-15T16:49:36+02:00 Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries Willumsen, David M. 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Scholarship Online book 2017 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 2022-08-05T10:29:33Z The book starts its empirical section in the most-likely case of party influence: Four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Analysing parliamentary survey data, it is argued that a very large proportion of voting unity can be explained by there simply being a lack of policy incentives to defect from the party line for a very large proportion of the members of the Nordic parliaments. However, it is also shown that preferences alone cannot explain the near-perfect voting unity found in these countries. Modelling legislators’ attitudes to party unity, the chapter shows that the most credible explanation of their decision to vote the party line against their preferred policy position is that MPs are aware of the long-term benefits of belonging to a united political party, and are willing to incur the short-term cost of voting against their preferred policy in order to obtain these benefits. Book Iceland Oxford University Press (via Crossref) Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Oxford University Press (via Crossref) |
op_collection_id |
croxfordunivpr |
language |
unknown |
description |
The book starts its empirical section in the most-likely case of party influence: Four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Analysing parliamentary survey data, it is argued that a very large proportion of voting unity can be explained by there simply being a lack of policy incentives to defect from the party line for a very large proportion of the members of the Nordic parliaments. However, it is also shown that preferences alone cannot explain the near-perfect voting unity found in these countries. Modelling legislators’ attitudes to party unity, the chapter shows that the most credible explanation of their decision to vote the party line against their preferred policy position is that MPs are aware of the long-term benefits of belonging to a united political party, and are willing to incur the short-term cost of voting against their preferred policy in order to obtain these benefits. |
format |
Book |
author |
Willumsen, David M. |
spellingShingle |
Willumsen, David M. Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries |
author_facet |
Willumsen, David M. |
author_sort |
Willumsen, David M. |
title |
Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries |
title_short |
Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries |
title_full |
Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries |
title_fullStr |
Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attitudes to Party Unity in the Nordic Countries |
title_sort |
attitudes to party unity in the nordic countries |
publisher |
Oxford University Press |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Oxford Scholarship Online |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805434.003.0003 |
_version_ |
1766039729335173120 |