Syntax
Abstract Following conventional, perhaps almost stereotypical wisdom, North American Indian languages distinguished themselves by polysynthesis— that is by the incorporation of several stems and affixes into one-word phrases or sentences (see e.g. Mithun 1983). At the opposite end on the scale of mo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book Part |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Oxford University PressOxford
1997
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/52234473/isbn-9780198240334-book-part-6.pdf |
id |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 2023-12-31T10:06:29+01:00 Syntax Drechsel, Emanuel J 1997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/52234473/isbn-9780198240334-book-part-6.pdf unknown Oxford University PressOxford Mobilian Jargon page 113-135 ISBN 9780198240334 9781383013238 book-chapter 1997 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 2023-12-06T08:52:49Z Abstract Following conventional, perhaps almost stereotypical wisdom, North American Indian languages distinguished themselves by polysynthesis— that is by the incorporation of several stems and affixes into one-word phrases or sentences (see e.g. Mithun 1983). At the opposite end on the scale of morphological synthesis and in sharp contrast to this type of grammatical pattern appear pidgins with their fundamentally analytic structure. Like Eskimo Jargon, Chinook Jargon, Delaware Jargon, and other Native American contact media, Mobilian Jargon generally lacked affixations or inflections; its speakers determined the grammatical functions of words by their position within a phrase or sentence, that is word order, and also from the sociolinguistic context. Book Part eskimo* Oxford University Press (via Crossref) 113 135 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Oxford University Press (via Crossref) |
op_collection_id |
croxfordunivpr |
language |
unknown |
description |
Abstract Following conventional, perhaps almost stereotypical wisdom, North American Indian languages distinguished themselves by polysynthesis— that is by the incorporation of several stems and affixes into one-word phrases or sentences (see e.g. Mithun 1983). At the opposite end on the scale of morphological synthesis and in sharp contrast to this type of grammatical pattern appear pidgins with their fundamentally analytic structure. Like Eskimo Jargon, Chinook Jargon, Delaware Jargon, and other Native American contact media, Mobilian Jargon generally lacked affixations or inflections; its speakers determined the grammatical functions of words by their position within a phrase or sentence, that is word order, and also from the sociolinguistic context. |
format |
Book Part |
author |
Drechsel, Emanuel J |
spellingShingle |
Drechsel, Emanuel J Syntax |
author_facet |
Drechsel, Emanuel J |
author_sort |
Drechsel, Emanuel J |
title |
Syntax |
title_short |
Syntax |
title_full |
Syntax |
title_fullStr |
Syntax |
title_full_unstemmed |
Syntax |
title_sort |
syntax |
publisher |
Oxford University PressOxford |
publishDate |
1997 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/52234473/isbn-9780198240334-book-part-6.pdf |
genre |
eskimo* |
genre_facet |
eskimo* |
op_source |
Mobilian Jargon page 113-135 ISBN 9780198240334 9781383013238 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240334.003.0006 |
container_start_page |
113 |
op_container_end_page |
135 |
_version_ |
1786838538952638464 |