The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling

Ecological modeling has played a key role in scientific investigations of the SGS LTER during the past several decades. The SGS LTER site, focused initially on the Central Plains Experimental Range (CPER), was the main grassland research site for the Grassland Biome component of the U.S. IBP effort...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parton, William J., Del Grosso, Stephen J.
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019 2023-05-15T18:40:43+02:00 The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling Parton, William J. Del Grosso, Stephen J. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019 unknown Oxford University Press Ecology of the Shortgrass Steppe book-chapter 2008 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019 2022-08-05T10:30:11Z Ecological modeling has played a key role in scientific investigations of the SGS LTER during the past several decades. The SGS LTER site, focused initially on the Central Plains Experimental Range (CPER), was the main grassland research site for the Grassland Biome component of the U.S. IBP effort (Lauenroth et al., this volume, chapter 1). Initial development of ecosystem models occurred from 1 970 to 1 975 as p art of t he I BP . All the U.S. I BP projects (grassland, tundra, desert, deciduous forest, and coniferous forest biomes) included research on the development of ecosystem models, with the goals of using models to help formulate and interpret field experiments, and of projecting the impact of changes in management practices on ecosystem dynamics. Models were developed as part of the Grassland Biome project (Bledsoe et al., 1971; Innis, 1978), and included modeling specialists who worked with research biologists on the development and formulation of the ecosystem models. The modeling activities of t he U.S. IBP Grassland Biome project included developing the ELM Grassland model (Innis, 1978). The ELM model was a complex process-oriented model that was intended to be used at all the Grassland Biome sites in the United States. This model was developed by postdoctoral fellows who were to formulate the different submodels, and then link the submodels using software that was developed as part of the program. The submodels included a plant production submodel, a cattle production submodel, a linked nutrient cycling and soil organic matter submodel, a grasshopper dynamics submodel, and a soil temperature and water submodel. Biophysical and biological data from the different sites were collected to develop and test the model. Model development was constrained by lack of knowledge about the biological processes that control ecosystem behavior, and by lack of appropriate data to test the ability of the model to simulate ecosystem responses to changes in grazing and fertility management practices. However, the ELM ... Book Part Tundra Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description Ecological modeling has played a key role in scientific investigations of the SGS LTER during the past several decades. The SGS LTER site, focused initially on the Central Plains Experimental Range (CPER), was the main grassland research site for the Grassland Biome component of the U.S. IBP effort (Lauenroth et al., this volume, chapter 1). Initial development of ecosystem models occurred from 1 970 to 1 975 as p art of t he I BP . All the U.S. I BP projects (grassland, tundra, desert, deciduous forest, and coniferous forest biomes) included research on the development of ecosystem models, with the goals of using models to help formulate and interpret field experiments, and of projecting the impact of changes in management practices on ecosystem dynamics. Models were developed as part of the Grassland Biome project (Bledsoe et al., 1971; Innis, 1978), and included modeling specialists who worked with research biologists on the development and formulation of the ecosystem models. The modeling activities of t he U.S. IBP Grassland Biome project included developing the ELM Grassland model (Innis, 1978). The ELM model was a complex process-oriented model that was intended to be used at all the Grassland Biome sites in the United States. This model was developed by postdoctoral fellows who were to formulate the different submodels, and then link the submodels using software that was developed as part of the program. The submodels included a plant production submodel, a cattle production submodel, a linked nutrient cycling and soil organic matter submodel, a grasshopper dynamics submodel, and a soil temperature and water submodel. Biophysical and biological data from the different sites were collected to develop and test the model. Model development was constrained by lack of knowledge about the biological processes that control ecosystem behavior, and by lack of appropriate data to test the ability of the model to simulate ecosystem responses to changes in grazing and fertility management practices. However, the ELM ...
format Book Part
author Parton, William J.
Del Grosso, Stephen J.
spellingShingle Parton, William J.
Del Grosso, Stephen J.
The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling
author_facet Parton, William J.
Del Grosso, Stephen J.
author_sort Parton, William J.
title The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling
title_short The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling
title_full The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling
title_fullStr The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling
title_full_unstemmed The Shortgrass Steppe and Ecosystem Modeling
title_sort shortgrass steppe and ecosystem modeling
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source Ecology of the Shortgrass Steppe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135824.003.0019
_version_ 1766230139052490752