Age and Size at Maturity

Age and size at maturity have been an object of interest to humans since the domestication of animals and plants, for one of the objectives of domestication was to produce an organism that grew fast and matured early at a large size. Selection was also practiced to produce animals that could be used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roff, Derek A.
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013 2023-12-31T10:04:17+01:00 Age and Size at Maturity Roff, Derek A. 2001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013 unknown Oxford University Press Evolutionary Ecology book-chapter 2001 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013 2023-12-06T09:05:12Z Age and size at maturity have been an object of interest to humans since the domestication of animals and plants, for one of the objectives of domestication was to produce an organism that grew fast and matured early at a large size. Selection was also practiced to produce animals that could be used for such purposes as hunting and portaging, and to produce products for pleasure alone, as seen in the many ornamental varieties of dogs, cats, goldfish, pigeons, and plants. All of these instances demonstrate that age and size at maturity are traits that are relatively easily molded by artificial selection and, by extension, natural selection. Historically, artificial selection experiments were concerned not with the evolution of age and size at maturity in natural populations but with the production of economically more valuable plants and animals. Recently, there has been a substantial increase in the quantitative genetic analysis of nondomesticated organisms, which has shown that, with respect to morphological traits such as adult size, there is typically abundant additive genetic variance, with heritabilities averaging approximately 0.4 (reviewed in Roff 1997). Life history traits, such as the age at maturity, show, on average, lower heritabilities (approx. 0.26) but still enough for rapid evolutionary change. Quantitative genetic analyses have shown that age and size at maturity can evolve, but the most significant advances in our understanding of the factors favoring particular age at maturity/body size combinations are due to mathematical models predicated upon the assumption that selection maximizes some fitness measure such as the rate of increase, r. In a paper entitled “Adaptive Significance of Large Size and Long Life of the Chaetognath Sagitta elegans in the Arctic,” McLaren (1966) produced a seminal analysis in which he incorporated all the important elements that have appeared in subsequent analyses of the evolution of age and size at maturity. Specifically, McLaren attempted to take into account the ... Book Part Arctic Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description Age and size at maturity have been an object of interest to humans since the domestication of animals and plants, for one of the objectives of domestication was to produce an organism that grew fast and matured early at a large size. Selection was also practiced to produce animals that could be used for such purposes as hunting and portaging, and to produce products for pleasure alone, as seen in the many ornamental varieties of dogs, cats, goldfish, pigeons, and plants. All of these instances demonstrate that age and size at maturity are traits that are relatively easily molded by artificial selection and, by extension, natural selection. Historically, artificial selection experiments were concerned not with the evolution of age and size at maturity in natural populations but with the production of economically more valuable plants and animals. Recently, there has been a substantial increase in the quantitative genetic analysis of nondomesticated organisms, which has shown that, with respect to morphological traits such as adult size, there is typically abundant additive genetic variance, with heritabilities averaging approximately 0.4 (reviewed in Roff 1997). Life history traits, such as the age at maturity, show, on average, lower heritabilities (approx. 0.26) but still enough for rapid evolutionary change. Quantitative genetic analyses have shown that age and size at maturity can evolve, but the most significant advances in our understanding of the factors favoring particular age at maturity/body size combinations are due to mathematical models predicated upon the assumption that selection maximizes some fitness measure such as the rate of increase, r. In a paper entitled “Adaptive Significance of Large Size and Long Life of the Chaetognath Sagitta elegans in the Arctic,” McLaren (1966) produced a seminal analysis in which he incorporated all the important elements that have appeared in subsequent analyses of the evolution of age and size at maturity. Specifically, McLaren attempted to take into account the ...
format Book Part
author Roff, Derek A.
spellingShingle Roff, Derek A.
Age and Size at Maturity
author_facet Roff, Derek A.
author_sort Roff, Derek A.
title Age and Size at Maturity
title_short Age and Size at Maturity
title_full Age and Size at Maturity
title_fullStr Age and Size at Maturity
title_full_unstemmed Age and Size at Maturity
title_sort age and size at maturity
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Evolutionary Ecology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131543.003.0013
_version_ 1786831409503010816