Then They Could Read and Write

Abstract My concern in this paper is with the changes in language brought about by the introduction of literacy into a society. In investigating this topic, one of the most useful research strategies available to us is the development of detailed case studies of either contemporary or historical sit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ferguson, Charles A
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University PressNew York, NY 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017
https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/52226761/isbn-9780195092905-book-part-17.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017 2023-12-31T09:58:41+01:00 Then They Could Read and Write Ferguson, Charles A 1996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017 https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/52226761/isbn-9780195092905-book-part-17.pdf unknown Oxford University PressNew York, NY Sociolinguistic Perspectives page 216-226 ISBN 9780195092905 9780197722435 book-chapter 1996 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017 2023-12-06T08:55:41Z Abstract My concern in this paper is with the changes in language brought about by the introduction of literacy into a society. In investigating this topic, one of the most useful research strategies available to us is the development of detailed case studies of either contemporary or historical situations in which societies become literate. In this paper, we will concern ourselves with four such instances, each of which involve the creation of a writing system appropriate to the vernacular language of a nonliterate society as part of an attempt to spread or strengthen Christianity among its members. The four cases we will consider include the development of the Armenian alphabet (by Mesrop), the Glagolitic alphabet (by Constantine), the Permian alphabet (by Stefan), and the Aleut alphabet (by Veniaminov). Each of these four cases differs from the others in the degree to which the introduction of literacy proved successful. With this in mind, each will be discussed in terms of four factors that are likely to control the path of vernacular literacy development in societies of various types and, therefore, to promote or to retard its chances for success: 1) the linguistic choices to be made; 2) the source of the literacy initiative; 3) the scope of literacy within the society; and 4) the extent of the institutional support for literacy within the society and the means employed to transmit the new literacy skills among the members of the society and from one generation to the next. Book Part aleut Oxford University Press (via Crossref) 216 226
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description Abstract My concern in this paper is with the changes in language brought about by the introduction of literacy into a society. In investigating this topic, one of the most useful research strategies available to us is the development of detailed case studies of either contemporary or historical situations in which societies become literate. In this paper, we will concern ourselves with four such instances, each of which involve the creation of a writing system appropriate to the vernacular language of a nonliterate society as part of an attempt to spread or strengthen Christianity among its members. The four cases we will consider include the development of the Armenian alphabet (by Mesrop), the Glagolitic alphabet (by Constantine), the Permian alphabet (by Stefan), and the Aleut alphabet (by Veniaminov). Each of these four cases differs from the others in the degree to which the introduction of literacy proved successful. With this in mind, each will be discussed in terms of four factors that are likely to control the path of vernacular literacy development in societies of various types and, therefore, to promote or to retard its chances for success: 1) the linguistic choices to be made; 2) the source of the literacy initiative; 3) the scope of literacy within the society; and 4) the extent of the institutional support for literacy within the society and the means employed to transmit the new literacy skills among the members of the society and from one generation to the next.
format Book Part
author Ferguson, Charles A
spellingShingle Ferguson, Charles A
Then They Could Read and Write
author_facet Ferguson, Charles A
author_sort Ferguson, Charles A
title Then They Could Read and Write
title_short Then They Could Read and Write
title_full Then They Could Read and Write
title_fullStr Then They Could Read and Write
title_full_unstemmed Then They Could Read and Write
title_sort then they could read and write
publisher Oxford University PressNew York, NY
publishDate 1996
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017
https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/52226761/isbn-9780195092905-book-part-17.pdf
genre aleut
genre_facet aleut
op_source Sociolinguistic Perspectives
page 216-226
ISBN 9780195092905 9780197722435
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092905.003.0017
container_start_page 216
op_container_end_page 226
_version_ 1786795374282801152