Association Agreements with Neighbours

Abstract Speaking of ‘European migration law’ does not exhibit quasi-imperial claims towards European countries which prefer not to join the EU or wait to be admitted. Association agreements and international treaties establish concentric circles with different degrees of participation. While Norway...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thym, Daniel
Format: Book Part
Language:English
Published: Oxford University PressOxford 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018
https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/57967087/oso-9780192894274-chapter-18.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018 2024-06-23T07:54:02+00:00 Association Agreements with Neighbours Thym, Daniel 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018 https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/57967087/oso-9780192894274-chapter-18.pdf en eng Oxford University PressOxford European Migration Law page 550-569 ISBN 0192894277 9780192894274 9780191915338 book-chapter 2023 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018 2024-06-04T06:12:12Z Abstract Speaking of ‘European migration law’ does not exhibit quasi-imperial claims towards European countries which prefer not to join the EU or wait to be admitted. Association agreements and international treaties establish concentric circles with different degrees of participation. While Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland subscribe to the free movement of persons and are associated with the Dublin and Schengen rulebook, subject to few caveats, the UK stays outside. There is currently no enhanced cooperation with the UK on free movement or migration control, besides the protection of acquired rights under the Withdrawal Agreement and transnational social security coordination with respect to persons being admitted on the territory in the years to come. The status of Turkish nationals residing in the Member States on the basis of the Ankara Agreement of 1963 and follow-up decisions has given rise to many Court judgments which increased the level of protection significantly. Judges established a de facto permanent residence for former ‘guest workers’ and their families, which equally embraces Turkish nationals entering nowadays. By contrast, association agreements with other neighbours to the South and East contain few provisions on legal migration nowadays. The management paradigm of justice and home affairs has replaced the single market model as the focus of attention. Book Part Iceland Oxford University Press Norway 550 C17P58
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
description Abstract Speaking of ‘European migration law’ does not exhibit quasi-imperial claims towards European countries which prefer not to join the EU or wait to be admitted. Association agreements and international treaties establish concentric circles with different degrees of participation. While Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland subscribe to the free movement of persons and are associated with the Dublin and Schengen rulebook, subject to few caveats, the UK stays outside. There is currently no enhanced cooperation with the UK on free movement or migration control, besides the protection of acquired rights under the Withdrawal Agreement and transnational social security coordination with respect to persons being admitted on the territory in the years to come. The status of Turkish nationals residing in the Member States on the basis of the Ankara Agreement of 1963 and follow-up decisions has given rise to many Court judgments which increased the level of protection significantly. Judges established a de facto permanent residence for former ‘guest workers’ and their families, which equally embraces Turkish nationals entering nowadays. By contrast, association agreements with other neighbours to the South and East contain few provisions on legal migration nowadays. The management paradigm of justice and home affairs has replaced the single market model as the focus of attention.
format Book Part
author Thym, Daniel
spellingShingle Thym, Daniel
Association Agreements with Neighbours
author_facet Thym, Daniel
author_sort Thym, Daniel
title Association Agreements with Neighbours
title_short Association Agreements with Neighbours
title_full Association Agreements with Neighbours
title_fullStr Association Agreements with Neighbours
title_full_unstemmed Association Agreements with Neighbours
title_sort association agreements with neighbours
publisher Oxford University PressOxford
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018
https://academic.oup.com/book/chapter-pdf/57967087/oso-9780192894274-chapter-18.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source European Migration Law
page 550-569
ISBN 0192894277 9780192894274 9780191915338
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018
container_start_page 550
op_container_end_page C17P58
_version_ 1802645971286360064