DNA persistence in predator saliva from multiple species and methods for optimal recovery from depredated carcasses

Abstract Molecular forensics is an important component of wildlife research and management. Using DNA from noninvasive samples collected at predation sites, we can identify predator species and obtain individual genotypes, improving our understanding of predator–prey dynamics and impacts of predator...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Mammalogy
Main Authors: Piaggio, Antoinette J, Shriner, Susan A, Young, Julie K, Griffin, Doreen L, Callahan, Peggy, Wostenberg, Darren J, Gese, Eric M, Hopken, Matthew W
Other Authors: Heske, Edward, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2019
Subjects:
Canis lupus
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz156
http://academic.oup.com/jmammal/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/jmammal/gyz156/30457722/gyz156.pdf
Description
Summary:Abstract Molecular forensics is an important component of wildlife research and management. Using DNA from noninvasive samples collected at predation sites, we can identify predator species and obtain individual genotypes, improving our understanding of predator–prey dynamics and impacts of predators on livestock and endangered species. To improve sample collection strategies, we tested two sample collection methods and estimated degradation rates of predator DNA on the carcasses of multiple prey species. We fed carcasses of calves (Bos taurus) and lambs (Ovis aires) to three captive predator species: wolves (Canis lupus), coyotes (C. latrans), and mountain lions (Puma concolor). We swabbed the carcass in the field, as well as removed a piece of hide from the carcasses and then swabbed it in the laboratory. We swabbed all tissue samples through time and attempted to identify the predator involved in the depredation using salivary DNA. We found the most successful approach for yielding viable salivary DNA was removing hide from the prey and swabbing it in the laboratory. As expected, genotyping error increased through time and our ability to obtain complete genotypes decreased over time, the latter falling below 50% after 24 h. We provide guidelines for sampling salivary DNA from tissues of depredated carcasses for maximum probability of detection.

Similar Items